}
        if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
            logger.debug("Available searchers: names={}", availableSearcherNameSet);
        }
    }

    @Override
    @PreDestroy
    public void close() throws Exception {
        if (executorService != null) {
            try {
                executorService.shutdown();
                executorService.awaitTermination(60, TimeUnit.SECONDS);

                        .pluginTypes("org.codelibs.opensearch.extension.ExtensionPlugin"));
        runner.ensureYellow();
    }

    @AfterClass
    public static void afterClass() throws Exception {
        runner.close();
        runner.clean();
    }

    @Before
    public void before() throws Exception {
        suggester = Suggester.builder().build(runner.client(), getTestId());
        suggester.createIndexIfNothing();
    }

   * be made {@code static} and its instances can be safely constructed and added in the {@link
   * ServiceManager} constructor without having to close over the partially constructed {@link
   * ServiceManager} instance (i.e. avoid leaking a pointer to {@code this}).
   */
  private final ServiceManagerState state;

  private final ImmutableList<Service> services;

class="'+this.icons.down+'"></span></a></td>':"")+"</tr></table>",this.template){case"modal":a='<div class="bootstrap-timepicker-widget modal hide fade in" data-backdrop="'+(this.modalBackdrop?"true":"false")+'"><div class="modal-header"><a href="#" class="close" data-dismiss="modal">&times;</a><h3>Pick a Time</h3></div><div class="modal-content">'+f+'</div><div class="modal-footer"><a href="#" class="btn btn-primary" data-dismiss="modal">OK</a></div></div>';break;case"dropdown":a='<div class="bootstrap-timepicker-widget...

   * before {@link Builder#build} is called, the builder is likely to perform better than an unsized
   * {@link #builder()} would have.
   *
   * <p>It is not specified if any performance benefits apply if {@code expectedSize} is close to,
   * but not exactly, the number of distinct elements added to the builder.
   *
   * @since 23.1
   */
  public static <E> Builder<E> builderWithExpectedSize(int expectedSize) {

### 해결책 제안하기 { #suggest-solutions }

* 질문을 충분히 이해한 후에는 가능한 **답변**을 제공할 수 있습니다.

* 많은 경우, 질문자의 **근본적인 문제나 사용 사례**를 이해하는 것이 더 좋습니다. 그들이 시도하는 방법보다 더 나은 해결책이 있을 수 있기 때문입니다.

### 종료 요청하기 { #ask-to-close }

질문자가 답변을 하면, 여러분이 문제를 해결했을 가능성이 높습니다. 축하합니다, **여러분은 영웅입니다**! 🦸

* 이제 문제를 해결했다면, 질문자에게 다음을 요청할 수 있습니다.

    * GitHub Discussions에서: 댓글을 **답변**으로 표시하도록 요청하세요.
    * GitHub Issues에서: 이슈를 **닫아달라고** 요청하세요.

- cloud.google.com/go/appengine: v1.7.1
- cloud.google.com/go/area120: v0.7.1
- cloud.google.com/go/artifactregistry: v1.13.0
- cloud.google.com/go/asset: v1.13.0
- cloud.google.com/go/assuredworkloads: v1.10.0
- cloud.google.com/go/automl: v1.12.0
- cloud.google.com/go/baremetalsolution: v0.5.0
- cloud.google.com/go/batch: v0.7.0
- cloud.google.com/go/beyondcorp: v0.5.0
- cloud.google.com/go/billing: v1.13.0

 * <p>Path types are often exclusive. For example, a dependency should not be both on the Java class path
 * and on the Java module path.</p>
 *
 * <h2>Relationship with Java compiler standard location</h2>
 * This enumeration is closely related to the {@link JavaFileManager.Location} enumerations.
 * A difference is that the latter enumerates input and output files, while {@code JavaPathType}

duplicate delete markers to be created if both source and target concurrently set a Delete Marker or if one/both of the clusters went down at tandem before the replication event was synced.This is an unavoidable side-effect in active-active replication caused by allowing delete markers set on a object version with `REPLICA` status back to source.

In the case of versioned deletes a.k.a permanent delete of a version by doing a `mc rm --version-id` on a object, replication implementation marks a...

### Other notable changes

* Bump GCE debian image to container-vm-v20161208 ([release notes](https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/containers/container_vms#changelog)) ([#38444](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/38444), [@timstclair](https://github.com/timstclair))
* Fix unmountDevice issue caused by shared mount in GCI ([#38411](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/38411), [@jingxu97](https://github.com/jingxu97))