* execute Queue#drainTo is not added *on top* of waiting for the timeout (which could make
     * the timeout arbitrarily inaccurate, given a queue that is slow to drain).
     */
    long deadline = System.nanoTime() + unit.toNanos(timeout);
    int added = 0;
    while (added < numElements) {

import org.junit.jupiter.api.Timeout
import org.junit.jupiter.api.extension.RegisterExtension
import org.junit.runner.Description
import org.junit.runners.model.Statement

@Suppress("deprecation")
@Timeout(30)
@Tag("Slow")
class MockWebServerTest {
  @RegisterExtension
  var platform = PlatformRule()
  private val server = MockWebServer()

  @BeforeEach
  fun setUp() {
    server.start()
  }

  @AfterEach

    try {
      constructor = type.getConstructor();
    } catch (NoSuchMethodException e) {
      return arbitraryConstantInstanceOrNull(type);
    }
    constructor.setAccessible(true); // accessibility check is too slow
    try {
      return constructor.newInstance();
    } catch (InstantiationException | IllegalAccessException impossible) {
      throw new AssertionError(impossible);
    } catch (InvocationTargetException e) {

     * execute Queue#drainTo is not added *on top* of waiting for the timeout (which could make
     * the timeout arbitrarily inaccurate, given a queue that is slow to drain).
     */
    long deadline = System.nanoTime() + unit.toNanos(timeout);
    int added = 0;
    while (added < numElements) {

    // for a list to reject setting an element, such as when the list does not permit
    // duplicate elements. For both of those cases,  we need to fall back to a slower
    // implementation.
    int from = 0;
    int to = 0;

    for (; from < list.size(); from++) {
      T element = list.get(from);
      if (!predicate.apply(element)) {
        if (from > to) {

import org.junit.jupiter.api.Disabled
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Tag
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test
import org.junit.jupiter.api.extension.RegisterExtension
import org.opentest4j.TestAbortedException

@Tag("Slow")
class OkHttpTest {
  @Suppress("RedundantVisibilityModifier")
  @JvmField
  @RegisterExtension
  public val platform = PlatformRule()

  @Suppress("RedundantVisibilityModifier")
  @JvmField

        .contains("Service FailRunService [FAILED] has failed in the RUNNING state");
  }

  /**
   * Tests that a ServiceManager can be fully shut down if one of its failure listeners is slow or
   * even permanently blocked.
   */
  public void testListenerDeadlock() throws InterruptedException {
    CountDownLatch failEnter = new CountDownLatch(1);
    CountDownLatch failLeave = new CountDownLatch(1);

     * determined experimentally to match our desired probability of false positives.
     */
    // NB: yes, this is surprisingly high, but that's what the experiments said was necessary
    // Raising this number slows the worst-case contains behavior, speeds up hashFloodingDetected,
    // and reduces the false-positive probability.
    static final int MAX_RUN_MULTIPLIER = 13;

    /**

   *
   * The deadline to respond to this ping attempts to limit the cost of being wrong. If it is too
   * long, streams created while we await the pong will reuse broken connections and inevitably
   * fail. If it is too short, slow connections will be marked as failed and extra TCP and TLS
   * handshakes will be required.
   *
   * The deadline is currently hardcoded. We may make this configurable in the future!
   */

    }

    /*
     * These methods "should" call checkNotNull. However, I'm wary of accidentally introducing
     * anything that might slow down execution on such a hot path. Given that the methods are only
     * package-private, I feel OK with just not testing them for NPE.
     *