// Create a minimal filter config that won't try to connect to a real server
        Map<String, String> initParams = new HashMap<>();
        initParams.put("jcifs.smb.client.domain", "TEST_DOMAIN");
        // Don't set domainController to avoid real connection attempts
        initParams.put("jcifs.http.loadBalance", "false");
        initParams.put("jcifs.http.enableBasic", "false");

        Model model = new Model();

        model.setParent(parent);
        model.setArtifactId("real-artifact");

        MavenProject project = new MavenProject(model);

        assertEquals("test-group", project.getGroupId(), "groupId proto-inheritance failed.");
        assertEquals("real-artifact", project.getArtifactId(), "artifactId is masked.");

whereas in MinIO erasure code you can lose as many as half of drives and still the data remains safe. Further, MinIO's erasure code is at the object level and can heal one object at a time. For RAID, healing can be done only at the volume level which translates into high downtime. As MinIO encodes each object individually, it can heal objects incrementally. Storage servers once deployed should not require drive replacement or healing for the lifetime of the server. MinIO's erasure coded backend is...

1.
2.
3.
4.

## Context
<!--- How has this issue affected you? What are you trying to accomplish? -->
<!--- Providing context helps us come up with a solution that is most useful in the real world -->

## Regression
<!-- Is this issue a regression? (Yes / No) -->
<!-- If Yes, optionally please include minio version or commit id or PR# that caused this regression, if you have these details. -->

			// If we have successfully written all the content that was asked
			// by the client, but we still see an error - this would mean
			// that we have some parts or data blocks missing or corrupted
			// - attempt a heal to successfully heal them for future calls.
			if written == partLength {
				if errors.Is(err, errFileNotFound) || errors.Is(err, errFileCorrupt) {
					healOnce.Do(func() {
						globalMRFState.addPartialOp(PartialOperation{

    }

    // TODO let the scope handler deal with this
    private static boolean isCompilePathElement(final String scope) {
        return Artifact.SCOPE_COMPILE.equals(scope)
                || Artifact.SCOPE_PROVIDED.equals(scope)
                || Artifact.SCOPE_SYSTEM.equals(scope);
    }

    // TODO let the scope handler deal with this

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of
this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in
the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to
use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of
the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so,
subject to the following conditions:

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

      description: |
        How has this issue affected you? What are you trying to accomplish? What other alternatives have you considered?
        Providing context helps us come up with a solution that is most useful in the real world
    validations:

    attributes:
      label: Context (optional)
      description: |
        How has this issue affected you? What are you trying to accomplish?
        Providing context helps us come up with a solution that is most useful in the real world
    validations:
      required: false
  - type: input
    id: page
    attributes:
      label: Page with the problem
      description: Please, provide a link to the relevant documentation page