* this range.
   */
  public boolean containsAll(Iterable<? extends C> values) {
    if (Iterables.isEmpty(values)) {
      return true;
    }

    // this optimizes testing equality of two range-backed sets
    if (values instanceof SortedSet) {
      SortedSet<? extends C> set = (SortedSet<? extends C>) values;
      Comparator<?> comparator = set.comparator();

      if (result == -1) {
        break;
      }
      total += result;
    }
    return total;
  }

  /** Compares the contents of the two {@link InputStream}s for equality. */
  static boolean contentsEqual(InputStream in1, InputStream in2) throws IOException {
    byte[] buf1 = createBuffer();
    byte[] buf2 = createBuffer();
    while (true) {

   * lesser. For example, {@code [] < [1.0f] < [1.0f, 2.0f] < [2.0f]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(float[],
   * float[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static Comparator<float[]> lexicographicalComparator() {
    return LexicographicalComparator.INSTANCE;

   * example, {@code [] < [1] < [1, 2] < [2]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(int[], int[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static Comparator<int[]> lexicographicalComparator() {
    return LexicographicalComparator.INSTANCE;
  }

    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
    E[] array = (E[]) elements.toArray();
    /*
     * For a Set, we guess that it contains no duplicates. That's just a guess for purpose of
     * sizing; if the Set uses different equality semantics, it might contain duplicates according
     * to equals(), and we will deduplicate those properly, albeit at some cost in allocations.
     */
    int expectedSize =

   * lesser. For example, {@code [] < [1.0] < [1.0, 2.0] < [2.0]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(double[],
   * double[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static Comparator<double[]> lexicographicalComparator() {

      return getImpl();
    }
  }

  private static class QueueSupplier extends CountingSupplier<Queue<Integer>> {
    @Override
    /*
     * We need a Queue that implements equals() for the equality tests we perform after
     * reserializing the multimap.
     */
    @SuppressWarnings("JdkObsolete")
    public Queue<Integer> getImpl() {
      return new LinkedList<>();
    }

   * example, {@code [] < [1L] < [1L, 2L] < [2L]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(long[],
   * long[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static Comparator<long[]> lexicographicalComparator() {
    return LexicographicalComparator.INSTANCE;

    return UsingToStringOrdering.INSTANCE;
  }

  /**
   * Returns an arbitrary ordering over all objects, for which {@code compare(a, b) == 0} implies
   * {@code a == b} (identity equality). There is no meaning whatsoever to the order imposed, but it
   * is constant for the life of the VM.
   *
   * <p>Because the ordering is identity-based, it is not "consistent with {@link

      refreshIfEmpty();
      return delegate.size();
    }

    @Override
    /*
     * Most Multimap implementations use a List or Set (or even Multiset) for their values, in which
     * case Multimap equality works as expected. Users who use a Collection type that does not
     * implement equals(), such as most Queue implementations, will get the same behavior from our