return 0, 0

	case OpCapture, OpStar, OpPlus, OpQuest, OpRepeat:
		return calcFlags(re.Sub[0], flags)

	case OpConcat, OpAlternate:
		// Gather the must and cant for each subexpression.
		// When we find a conflicting subexpression, insert the necessary
		// flags around the previously identified span and start over.
		var must, cant, allCant printFlags
		start := 0
		last := 0
		did := false
		for i, sub := range re.Sub {

        sources.hasDependencyAlias('other', 'getOther', "This dependency was declared in ${escapedContext}")
    }

    @Issue("https://github.com/gradle/gradle/issues/20060")
    def "no name conflicting of library accessors"() {
        when:
        generate {
            library('com-company-libs-a', 'com.company:libs-a:1.0')
            library('com-companylibs-b', 'com.companylibs:libs-b:1.0')
        }

			if from, r, ok := replacement(mod, index.replace); ok {
				modRoot := MainModules.ModRoot(v)
				if foundModRoot != "" && foundFrom != from && found != r {
					base.Errorf("conflicting replacements found for %v in workspace modules defined by %v and %v",
						mod, modFilePath(foundModRoot), modFilePath(modRoot))
					return found, foundModRoot, modFilePath(foundModRoot)
				}

// Internally, this uses a shared informer, so calling this multiple times will share the same internals. This is keyed on
// unique {Type,LabelSelector,FieldSelector}.
//
// Warning: if conflicting filter.ObjectTransform are used for the same key, the first one registered wins.
// This means there must only be one filter configuration for a given type using the same kube.Client.
// Use with caution.

- _strict dependencies_ don't suffer an ordering problem: they are applied transitively to the subgraph, and it doesn't matter in which order dependencies are declared.
- conflicting strict dependencies will trigger a build failure that you have to resolve

		}, valid: true},
		{name: "simple redirect", route: &networking.HTTPRoute{
			Redirect: &networking.HTTPRedirect{
				Uri:       "/lerp",
				Authority: "foo.biz",
			},
		}, valid: true},
		{name: "conflicting redirect and route", route: &networking.HTTPRoute{
			Route: []*networking.HTTPRouteDestination{{
				Destination: &networking.Destination{Host: "foo.baz"},
			}},
			Redirect: &networking.HTTPRedirect{

 *   }
 * }
 * </pre>
 *
 * @since 1.0-milestone-6
 */
public interface ResolutionStrategy {

    /**
     * In case of conflict, Gradle by default uses the newest of conflicting versions.
     * However, you can change this behavior. Use this method to configure the resolution to fail eagerly on any version conflict, e.g.

		}
	}
}

func TestValidateFinalizersPreventConflictingFinalizers(t *testing.T) {
	testcases := map[string]struct {
		ObjectMeta  metav1.ObjectMeta
		ExpectedErr string
	}{
		"conflicting finalizers": {
			ObjectMeta:  metav1.ObjectMeta{Name: "test", ResourceVersion: "1", Finalizers: []string{metav1.FinalizerOrphanDependents, metav1.FinalizerDeleteDependents}},
			ExpectedErr: "cannot be both set",
		},
	}

            "found TPU_SYSTEM devices with conflicting jobs 'localhost' and "
            "'worker'"),
        std::make_tuple<DeviceNames, std::string>(
            {"/job:localhost/replica:0/task:0/device:TPU_SYSTEM:0",
             "/job:localhost/replica:1/task:0/device:TPU_SYSTEM:0"},
            "found TPU_SYSTEM devices with conflicting replicas '0' and '1'"),
        std::make_tuple<DeviceNames, std::string>(

		default:
			if hasUnexpectedController(claim, set, pod) {
				// Add an event so the user knows they're in a strange configuration. The claim will be cleaned up below.
				msg := fmt.Sprintf("PersistentVolumeClaim %s has a conflicting OwnerReference that acts as a manging controller, the retention policy is ignored for this claim", claimName)
				spc.recorder.Event(set, v1.EventTypeWarning, "ConflictingController", msg)
			}