Isso é especialmente útil para uma **base de código grande** onde **as mesmas dependências** são utilizadas repetidamente em **muitas *operações de rota***.

## `Async` ou não, eis a questão

  }

  @Override
  public boolean equals(@Nullable Object object) {
    return Maps.equalsImpl(this, object);
  }

  @Override
  public int hashCode() {
    // not caching hash code since it could change if map values are mutable
    // in a way that modifies their hash codes
    return entrySet().hashCode();
  }

  @Override
  public String toString() {
    return Maps.toStringImpl(this);
  }

      looping.
  """
  default = environ_cp.get(var_name) or var_default
  full_query = '%s [Default is %s]: ' % (
      ask_for_var,
      default,
  )

  for _ in range(n_ask_attempts):
    val = get_from_env_or_user_or_default(environ_cp, var_name, full_query,
                                          default)
    if check_success(val):
      break
    if not suppress_default_error:

   * array is "safe" in that no references to it are maintained by the collection. The caller is
   * thus free to modify the returned array.
   *
   * <p>This method assumes that the collection size doesn't change while the method is running.
   *
   * <p>TODO(kevinb): support concurrently modified collections?
   *
   * @param c the collection for which to return an array of elements
   */

  * **IMPORTANT**: See Action Required for important actions related to this change.

import org.opensearch.search.aggregations.bucket.missing.MissingAggregationBuilder;
import org.opensearch.search.aggregations.bucket.range.DateRangeAggregationBuilder;
import org.opensearch.search.aggregations.bucket.range.IpRangeAggregationBuilder;
import org.opensearch.search.aggregations.bucket.range.RangeAggregationBuilder;
import org.opensearch.search.aggregations.bucket.sampler.SamplerAggregationBuilder;

        // Given
        byte[] buffer = new byte[512];
        int bodyStart = 0;
        int dataLength = 10;
        // Use a large but safe offset value that fits in signed byte range (120)
        int dataOffsetValue = 120;

        // Write structure
        SMBUtil.writeInt2(17, buffer, bodyStart);
        buffer[bodyStart + 2] = (byte) dataOffsetValue;

        DcerpcHandle handle = mock(DcerpcHandle.class);
        LsaPolicyHandle policy = mock(LsaPolicyHandle.class);

        jcifs.SID[] sids = new jcifs.SID[] { sid("S-1-1-0") };

        // Arrange a minimal response with given retval
        doAnswer(inv -> {
            jcifs.dcerpc.msrpc.MsrpcLookupSids rpc = inv.getArgument(0);
            rpc.retval = ret;
            // Provide empty arrays to satisfy code paths

   * processing and may run concurrently, for example, if the JVM flag {@code
   * -XX:+ExplicitGCInvokesConcurrent} is used.
   *
   * <p>Whenever possible, it is preferable to test directly for some observable change resulting
   * from GC, as with {@link #awaitClear}. Because there are no guarantees for the order of GC
   * finalization processing, there may still be some unfinished work for the GC to do after this
   * method returns.

     * to be the case). Thus, this test is more of a regression test.
     *
     * Rough instructions to regenerate the test outputs and verify correctness:
     * - Temporarily change this test:
     * --- Comment out assertEquals.
     * --- System.out.println(input + " " + simplifyPath(input));
     * --- fail(). (If the test were to pass, its output would be hidden.)
     * - Run the test.