*       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

Essas dependências serão executadas/resolvidas da mesma forma que dependências comuns. Mas o valor delas (se existir algum) não será passado para a sua *função de operação de rota*.

/// tip | Dica

Alguns editores de texto checam parâmetros de funções não utilizados, e os mostram como erros.

Utilizando `dependencies` no *decorador da operação de rota* você pode garantir que elas serão executadas enquanto evita errors de editores/ferramentas.

    public @Nullable V2 get(@Nullable Object rowKey, @Nullable Object columnKey) {
      // The function is passed a null input only when the table contains a null
      // value.
      // The cast is safe because of the contains() check.
      return contains(rowKey, columnKey)
          ? function.apply(uncheckedCastNullableTToT(fromTable.get(rowKey, columnKey)))
          : null;
    }

    @Override
    public int size() {

   *   <li>To treat {@link InterruptedException} uniformly with other exceptions, use {@link
   *       Futures#getChecked(Future, Class) Futures.getChecked}.
   *   <li>To get uninterruptibility and remove checked exceptions, use {@link
   *       Futures#getUnchecked}.
   * </ul>
   *
   * @throws ExecutionException if the computation threw an exception
   * @throws CancellationException if the computation was cancelled

                }),
        (accum, t) -> {
          /*
           * We assign these to variables before calling checkNotNull to work around a bug in our
           * nullness checker.
           */
          K key = keyFunction.apply(t);
          V newValue = valueFunction.apply(t);
          accum.put(
              checkNotNull(key, "Null key for input %s", t),

      }
    }

    /*
     * TODO(cpovirk): `return (V) removedValue` once our checker permits that.
     *
     * (We promoted a class of warnings into errors because sometimes they indicate real problems.
     * But now we need to "undo" some instance of spurious errors, as discussed in
     * https://github.com/jspecify/checker-framework/issues/8.)
     */
    return removedValue == null ? null : (V) removedValue;
  }