if (nanoTime >= waitUntil) return@withLock null
          val editCountBefore = editCount
          yieldUntil { nanoTime >= waitUntil || editCount > editCountBefore }
        }
        // TODO report compiler bug
        TODO("Can't get here")
      }
    }

    override fun put(element: T) {
      taskRunner.withLock {
        delegate.put(element)
        editCount++
      }
    }

          afterRanInterruptiblyFailure(error);
        }
      }
    }
  }

  @SuppressWarnings({
    "Interruption", // We are restoring an interrupt on this thread.
    "ThreadPriorityCheck", // TODO: b/175898629 - Consider onSpinWait.
  })
  private void waitForInterrupt(Thread currentThread) {
    /*
     * If someone called cancel(true), it is possible that the interrupted bit hasn't been set yet.

   */
  public ThreadFactory build() {
    return doBuild(this);
  }

  // Split out so that the anonymous ThreadFactory can't contain a reference back to the builder.
  // At least, I assume that's why. TODO(cpovirk): Check, and maybe add a test for this.
  @SuppressWarnings("ThreadPriorityCheck") // We only propagate user requests (which we discourage).
  private static ThreadFactory doBuild(ThreadFactoryBuilder builder) {

@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
public abstract class AbstractMultisetSetCountTester<E> extends AbstractMultisetTester<E> {
  /*
   * TODO: consider adding MultisetFeatures.SUPPORTS_SET_COUNT. Currently we
   * assume that using setCount() to increase the count is permitted iff add()
   * is permitted and similarly for decrease/remove(). We assume that a

  /**
   * Returns the value associated with {@code key} in this cache, or {@code null} if there is no
   * cached value for {@code key}.
   *
   * @since 11.0
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue // TODO(b/27479612): consider removing this?
  @Nullable V getIfPresent(@CompatibleWith("K") Object key);

  /**
   * Returns the value associated with {@code key} in this cache, obtaining that value from {@code

import com.google.common.base.Supplier;
import com.google.errorprone.annotations.Immutable;

/**
 * Explicitly named subinterface of {@link Supplier} that can be marked {@literal @}{@link
 * Immutable}.
 */
// TODO(cpovirk): Should we just use ChecksumType directly instead of defining this type?
@Immutable

plugins {
  id("org.graalvm.buildtools.native")
  kotlin("jvm")
}

animalsniffer {
  isIgnoreFailures = true
}

// TODO reenable other tests
// https://github.com/square/okhttp/issues/8901
//sourceSets {
//  test {
//    java.srcDirs(
//      "../okhttp-brotli/src/test/java",
//      "../okhttp-dnsoverhttps/src/test/java",
//      "../okhttp-logging-interceptor/src/test/java",
//      "../okhttp-sse/src/test/java",
//    )

   * @throws ArithmeticException if {@code mode} is {@link RoundingMode#UNNECESSARY} and {@code x}
   *     is not a power of two
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("fallthrough")
  // TODO(kevinb): remove after this warning is disabled globally
  public static int log2(BigInteger x, RoundingMode mode) {
    checkPositive("x", checkNotNull(x));
    int logFloor = x.bitLength() - 1;
    switch (mode) {

        val requestBody = MultipartBody.Builder()
            .setType(MultipartBody.FORM)
            .addFormDataPart("title", "Square Logo")
            .addFormDataPart("image", "logo-square.png",
                File("docs/images/logo-square.png").asRequestBody(MEDIA_TYPE_PNG))
            .build()

        val request = Request.Builder()
            .header("Authorization", "Client-ID $IMGUR_CLIENT_ID")

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtIncompatible;
import com.google.common.collect.TableCollectionTest.RowMapTests;
import java.util.Map;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

@GwtIncompatible // TODO(hhchan): ArrayTable
@NullUnmarked
public class ArrayTableRowMapTest extends RowMapTests {
  public ArrayTableRowMapTest() {
    super(true, false, false, false);
  }

  @Override