assertThat(alreadyThere).containsExactly("already", "there").inOrder();
    assertFalse(changed);
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // NullPointerTester
  public void testNullPointerExceptions() {
    NullPointerTester tester = new NullPointerTester();
    tester.testAllPublicStaticMethods(Iterators.class);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // Only used by @GwtIncompatible code

    return ImmutableSortedSet.copyOf(elements);
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // NullPointerTester
  public void testNullPointers() {
    new NullPointerTester().testAllPublicStaticMethods(ImmutableSortedSet.class);
  }

  public void testEmpty_comparator() {
    SortedSet<String> set = of();

    hashmap.put("baz", null);

    assertEquals(hashmap.toString(), Maps.toStringImpl(hashmap));
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // NullPointerTester
  public void testNullPointerExceptions() {
    new NullPointerTester().testAllPublicStaticMethods(Maps.class);
  }

  private static final Map<Integer, Integer> EMPTY = emptyMap();

   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code occurrences} is negative
   */
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): remove and removeExactly currently accept null inputs only
   * if occurrences == 0. This satisfies both NullPointerTester and
   * CollectionRemoveTester.testRemove_nullAllowed, but it's not clear that it's
   * a good policy, especially because, in order for the test to pass, the

    hashmap.put("baz", null);

    assertEquals(hashmap.toString(), Maps.toStringImpl(hashmap));
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // NullPointerTester
  public void testNullPointerExceptions() {
    new NullPointerTester().testAllPublicStaticMethods(Maps.class);
  }

  private static final Map<Integer, Integer> EMPTY = emptyMap();

import com.google.common.testing.ClassSanityTester.ParameterHasNoDistinctValueException;
import com.google.common.testing.ClassSanityTester.ParameterNotInstantiableException;
import com.google.common.testing.NullPointerTester.Visibility;
import com.google.errorprone.annotations.Keep;
import java.io.Serializable;
import java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException;
import java.util.AbstractList;
import java.util.ArrayList;

    return new TypeToken<T[]>() {}.where(new TypeParameter<T>() {}, componentType);
  }

  public <T> void testNulls() {
    new NullPointerTester().testAllPublicStaticMethods(TypeToken.class);
    new NullPointerTester()
        .setDefault(TypeParameter.class, new TypeParameter<T>() {})
        .testAllPublicInstanceMethods(TypeToken.of(String.class));
  }

        assertThat(map).isEmpty();
        assertThat(segment.valueReferenceQueue.poll()).isNull();
      }
    }
  }

  public void testNullParameters() throws Exception {
    NullPointerTester tester = new NullPointerTester();
    tester.testAllPublicInstanceMethods(makeLocalCache(createCacheBuilder()));
    CacheLoader<Object, Object> loader = identityLoader();

        assertThat(map).isEmpty();
        assertThat(segment.valueReferenceQueue.poll()).isNull();
      }
    }
  }

  public void testNullParameters() throws Exception {
    NullPointerTester tester = new NullPointerTester();
    tester.testAllPublicInstanceMethods(makeLocalCache(createCacheBuilder()));
    CacheLoader<Object, Object> loader = identityLoader();

     * implement Function<A, B>, as discussed in a class-level comment), it would make some sense to
     * perform runtime null checks on the input and output. (That would also make NullPointerTester
     * happy!) However, since we didn't do that for many years, we're not about to start now.
     * (Runtime checks could be particularly bad for users of LegacyConverter.)
     *