// metacacheSharePrefix controls whether prefixes on dirty paths are always shared.
	// This will make `test/a` and `test/b` share listings if they are concurrent.
	// Enabling this will make cache sharing more likely and cause less IO,
	// but may cause additional latency to some calls.
	metacacheSharePrefix = false
)

//go:generate msgp -file $GOFILE -unexported

// metacache contains a tracked cache entry.
type metacache struct {

                cause = e;
            }
            if (cause instanceof OpenSearchStatusException) {
                final RestStatus status = ((OpenSearchStatusException) cause).status();
                switch (status) {
                case UNAUTHORIZED:
                    logger.warn("[{}] Unauthorized access: {}", i, SystemUtil.getSearchEngineHttpAddress(), cause);
                    break;

    /**
     * Gets the problems that were encountered during the settings building. Note that only problems of severity
     * {@link SettingsProblem.Severity#WARNING} and below are reported here. Problems with a higher severity level cause
     * the settings builder to fail with a {@link SettingsBuildingException}.
     *
     * @return The problems that were encountered during the settings building, can be empty but never {@code null}.
     */

  @Override
  public V getUnchecked(K key) {
    try {
      return get(key);
    } catch (ExecutionException e) {
      throw new UncheckedExecutionException(e.getCause());
    }
  }

  @Override
  public ImmutableMap<K, V> getAll(Iterable<? extends K> keys) throws ExecutionException {
    Map<K, V> result = Maps.newLinkedHashMap();
    for (K key : keys) {

  }

  static <K, V> void assertNotified(
      QueuingRemovalListener<K, V> listener, K key, V value, RemovalCause cause) {
    RemovalNotification<K, V> notification = listener.remove();
    assertSame(key, notification.getKey());
    assertSame(value, notification.getValue());
    assertSame(cause, notification.getCause());
  }

  // Segment core tests

  public void testNewEntry() {

  }

  static <K, V> void assertNotified(
      QueuingRemovalListener<K, V> listener, K key, V value, RemovalCause cause) {
    RemovalNotification<K, V> notification = listener.remove();
    assertSame(key, notification.getKey());
    assertSame(value, notification.getValue());
    assertSame(cause, notification.getCause());
  }

  // Segment core tests

  public void testNewEntry() {

    this.max = max;
  }

  /**
   * Returns statistics over a dataset containing the given values.
   *
   * @param values a series of values, which will be converted to {@code double} values (this may
   *     cause loss of precision)
   */
  public static Stats of(Iterable<? extends Number> values) {
    StatsAccumulator accumulator = new StatsAccumulator();
    accumulator.addAll(values);
    return accumulator.snapshot();
  }

the vast majority of deployments in any negative way.

> Will an upgrade of an existing MinIO cluster impact the SLA of the cluster or will it even cause downtime?

No, an upgrade should not cause any downtime. However, on the first startup -
since MinIO will attempt to migrate any existing IAM data - the boot process may
take slightly longer, but may not be visibly noticeable. Once the migration has

        if (jvmArgs.size > 1) {
            throw GradleException("gradle.properties and build-logic/gradle.properties have different org.gradle.jvmargs " +
                "which may cause two daemons to be spawned on CI and in IDEA. " +
                "Use the same org.gradle.jvmargs for both builds.")
        }
    }
}

fun readProperties(propertiesFile: File) = java.util.Properties().apply {

     * and will cause {@link #build} to fail.
     */
    @CanIgnoreReturnValue
    public <T extends B> Builder<B> put(Class<T> key, T value) {
      mapBuilder.put(key, value);
      return this;
    }

    /**
     * Associates all of {@code map's} keys and values in the built map. Duplicate keys are not
     * allowed, and will cause {@link #build} to fail.
     *