}
        require(null !in (protocolsCopy as List<Protocol?>)) {
          "protocols must not contain null"
        }

        // Remove protocols that we no longer support.
        @Suppress("DEPRECATION")
        protocolsCopy.remove(Protocol.SPDY_3)

        if (protocolsCopy != this.protocols) {
          this.routeDatabase = null
        }

			break
		}
	}
}

// filterObjectsOnly will remove prefix directories.
// Order is preserved, but the underlying slice is modified.
func (m *metaCacheEntriesSorted) filterObjectsOnly() {
	dst := m.o[:0]
	for _, o := range m.o {
		if !o.isDir() {
			dst = append(dst, o)
		}
	}
	m.o = dst
}

// filterPrefixesOnly will remove objects.
// Order is preserved, but the underlying slice is modified.

OkHttp 4.0, we kept our Java-first APIs. With 5.0 we're continuing to support Java and adding
additional improvements for Kotlin users. In this alpha we're excited to skip-the-builder for
requests and remove a common source of non-null assertions (`!!`) on the response body.

The alpha releases in the 5.0.0 series have production-quality code and an unstable API. We expect

- Remove balanced attached node volumes feature. ([#102443](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/102443), [@ravisantoshgudimetla](https://github.com/ravisantoshgudimetla))
- Remove deprecated `--generator` flag from `kubectl autoscale`. ([#99900](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/99900), [@MadhavJivrajani](https://github.com/MadhavJivrajani))

     their option, further distribute the Covered Software under the terms of
     either this License or such Secondary License(s).

3.4. Notices

     You may not remove or alter the substance of any license notices (including
     copyright notices, patent notices, disclaimers of warranty, or limitations
     of liability) contained within the Source Code Form of the Covered

          <version>4.5.0</version>
          <executions>
            <!--
            We can apparently have only one <jdk> per execution: Others are silently ignored :(
            To properly test this, you need to remove existing toolchains:
            rm -rf ~/.m2/jdks/ ~/.m2/toolchains.xml
            (But don't run that if you have put something into ~/.m2/toolchains.xml yourself.)
            -->
            <execution>

          <version>4.5.0</version>
          <executions>
            <!--
            We can apparently have only one <jdk> per execution: Others are silently ignored :(
            To properly test this, you need to remove existing toolchains:
            rm -rf ~/.m2/jdks/ ~/.m2/toolchains.xml
            (But don't run that if you have put something into ~/.m2/toolchains.xml yourself.)
            -->
            <execution>

            RequestOptionCall<IndexRequestBuilder> entityCall) {
        return doBatchDelete(new BulkList<>(list, call, entityCall), null);
    }

    // #pending create, modify, remove

            RequestOptionCall<IndexRequestBuilder> entityCall) {
        return doBatchDelete(new BulkList<>(list, call, entityCall), null);
    }

    // #pending create, modify, remove

    unfiltered.put("three", 3);
    unfiltered.put("four", 4);
    assertEquals(ImmutableMap.of("two", 2, "three", 3, "four", 4), unfiltered);
    assertEquals(ImmutableMap.of("three", 3, "four", 4), filtered);

    unfiltered.remove("three");
    assertEquals(ImmutableMap.of("two", 2, "four", 4), unfiltered);
    assertEquals(ImmutableMap.of("four", 4), filtered);

    unfiltered.clear();
    assertEquals(ImmutableMap.of(), unfiltered);