import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.HOURS;
import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.MINUTES;
import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.SECONDS;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertThrows;

import com.google.common.base.Suppliers;
import com.google.common.cache.LocalCache.Strength;
import com.google.common.testing.EqualsTester;
import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**

import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.SECONDS;

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtIncompatible;
import com.google.common.annotations.J2ktIncompatible;
import com.google.common.base.Function;
import com.google.common.testing.GcFinalization;
import com.google.common.testing.TestLogHandler;
import com.google.j2objc.annotations.J2ObjCIncompatible;
import java.lang.ref.WeakReference;

  /**
   * Simulate some of the races that can happen on add. We can't easily simulate the race that
   * happens when an {@link AtomicInteger#compareAndSet} fails, but we can simulate the case where
   * the putIfAbsent returns a non-null value, and the case where the replace() of an observed zero
   * fails.
   */
  public void testAdd_withFailures() {
    AtomicInteger existing = new AtomicInteger(12);

/// info

A "bearer" token is not the only option.

But it's the best one for our use case.

And it might be the best for most use cases, unless you are an OAuth2 expert and know exactly why there's another option that better suits your needs.

In that case, **FastAPI** also provides you with the tools to build it.

///

  static void awaitWaiting(Thread t) {
    while (true) {
      Thread.State state = t.getState();
      switch (state) {
        case RUNNABLE:
        case BLOCKED:
          Thread.yield();
          break;
        case WAITING:
          return;
        default:
          throw new AssertionError("unexpected state: " + state);
      }
    }
  }

 * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
 * limitations under the License.
 */

package com.google.common.collect;

import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkArgument;
import static com.google.common.collect.Sets.newHashSet;
import static java.util.Arrays.asList;

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;

E esses modelos estão compartilhando muitos dos dados e duplicando nomes e tipos de atributos.

Nós poderíamos fazer melhor.

Podemos declarar um modelo `UserBase` que serve como base para nossos outros modelos. E então podemos fazer subclasses desse modelo que herdam seus atributos (declarações de tipo, validação, etc.).

Toda conversão de dados, validação, documentação, etc. ainda funcionará normalmente.

from typing import Optional

from fastapi.openapi.models import APIKey, APIKeyIn
from fastapi.security.base import SecurityBase
from starlette.exceptions import HTTPException
from starlette.requests import Request
from starlette.status import HTTP_403_FORBIDDEN
from typing_extensions import Annotated, Doc


class APIKeyBase(SecurityBase):
    pass


class APIKeyQuery(APIKeyBase):
    """

		Host:       u.Host,
	}
	req = req.WithContext(ctx)
	if body != nil {
		switch v := body.(type) {
		case *bytes.Buffer:
			req.ContentLength = int64(v.Len())
			buf := v.Bytes()
			req.GetBody = func() (io.ReadCloser, error) {
				r := bytes.NewReader(buf)
				return io.NopCloser(r), nil
			}
		case *bytes.Reader:
			req.ContentLength = int64(v.Len())
			snapshot := *v

**FastAPI** weiß, dass es die Klasse `OAuth2PasswordBearer` (deklariert in einer Abhängigkeit) verwenden kann, um das Sicherheitsschema in OpenAPI zu definieren, da es von `fastapi.security.oauth2.OAuth2` erbt, das wiederum von `fastapi.security.base.SecurityBase` erbt.

Alle Sicherheits-Werkzeuge, die in OpenAPI integriert sind (und die automatische API-Dokumentation), erben von `SecurityBase`, so weiß **FastAPI**, wie es sie in OpenAPI integrieren muss.

///