* so let's populate them here
             */

            andxCommand = buffer[bufferIndex];
            andxOffset = readInt2( buffer, bufferIndex + 2 );

            if( andxOffset == 0 ) { /* Snap server workaround */
                andxCommand = (byte)0xFF;
            }

            /*
             * no point in calling readParameterWordsWireFormat if there are no more

# Requestbody

Wenn Sie Daten von einem <abbr title="Client: Eine Software, die sich mit einem Server verbindet.">Client</abbr> (sagen wir, einem Browser) zu Ihrer API senden, dann senden Sie diese als einen **Requestbody** (Deutsch: Anfragekörper).

Ein **Request**body sind Daten, die vom Client zu Ihrer API gesendet werden. Ein **Response**body (Deutsch: Antwortkörper) sind Daten, die Ihre API zum Client sendet.

Но клиент/пользователь этого не увидит. Вместо этого клиент получит сообщение "Internal Server Error" с кодом состояния HTTP `500`.

Так и должно быть, потому что если в вашем *ответе* или где-либо в вашем коде (не в *запросе* клиента) возникает Pydantic `ValidationError`, то это действительно ошибка в вашем коде.

And these models are all sharing a lot of the data and duplicating attribute names and types.

We could do better.

We can declare a `UserBase` model that serves as a base for our other models. And then we can make subclasses of that model that inherit its attributes (type declarations, validation, etc).

All the data conversion, validation, documentation, etc. will still work as normally.

	if len(parsedConfig.QueueList) > 0 {
		for i, q1 := range parsedConfig.QueueList[:len(parsedConfig.QueueList)-1] {
			for _, q2 := range parsedConfig.QueueList[i+1:] {
				// Removes the region from ARN if server region is not set
				if q2.ARN.region != "" && q1.ARN.region == "" {
					q2.ARN.region = ""
				}
				if reflect.DeepEqual(q1, q2) {
					return &ErrDuplicateQueueConfiguration{q1}
				}
			}
		}
	}

     * key on an absent value should result in a single call to either {@code recordLoadSuccess} or
     * {@code recordLoadException} and multiple calls to this method, despite all being served by
     * the results of a single load operation.
     *
     * @param count the number of misses to record
     * @since 11.0
     */
    void recordMisses(int count);

    /**

  // +optional
  optional string requestSubResource = 15;

  // Name is the name of the object as presented in the request.  On a CREATE operation, the client may omit name and
  // rely on the server to generate the name.  If that is the case, this field will contain an empty string.
  // +optional
  optional string name = 5;

  // Namespace is the namespace associated with the request (if any).
  // +optional

  // +optional
  optional string requestSubResource = 15;

  // Name is the name of the object as presented in the request.  On a CREATE operation, the client may omit name and
  // rely on the server to generate the name.  If that is the case, this field will contain an empty string.
  // +optional
  optional string name = 5;

  // Namespace is the namespace associated with the request (if any).
  // +optional

  sbt_commands=( "${app_commands[@]}" "$1" )
}
addResidual () {
  dlog "[residual] arg = '$1'"
  residual_args=( "${residual_args[@]}" "$1" )
}
addDebugger () {
  addJava "-Xdebug -Xrunjdwp:transport=dt_socket,server=y,suspend=n,address=$1"
}
addConfigOpts () {
  dlog "[addConfigOpts] arg = '$*'"
  for item in $*
  do
    addJava "$item"
  done
}
# a ham-fisted attempt to move some memory settings in concert

       * make a ton of sense to have a separate tests for each. But having tests for each doesn't
       * really hurt anything, and maybe it will serve a purpose in a future in which Java has a
       * built-in nullness feature?
       */
      "ExtendsObject",
    })
    <T extends Object> void withObjectBound(List<T> list) {}

    @SuppressWarnings("unused")