* ImmutableSortedMap}.
   *
   * @throws UnsupportedOperationException always
   * @deprecated Use {@link ImmutableSortedMap#toImmutableSortedMap}.
   */
  @DoNotCall("Use toImmutableSortedMap")
  @Deprecated
  public static <T extends @Nullable Object, K, V>
      Collector<T, ?, ImmutableMap<K, V>> toImmutableMap(

  //  - The algorithm name is not case-sensitive.
  @SuppressWarnings("deprecation") // We still need to test our deprecated APIs.
  private static final ImmutableMap<String, HashFunction> ALGORITHMS =
      new ImmutableMap.Builder<String, HashFunction>()
          .put("MD5", md5())
          .put("SHA", sha1()) // Not the official name, but still works

 *       of the type argument supplied by the user of the class: For example, {@code
 *       ImmutableMap.get} returns {@code @Nullable E} because the method can return {@code null}
 *       even on an {@code ImmutableMap<K, @NonNull String>}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Consumers of this annotation include:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>NullAway, which <a

 *       of the type argument supplied by the user of the class: For example, {@code
 *       ImmutableMap.get} returns {@code @Nullable E} because the method can return {@code null}
 *       even on an {@code ImmutableMap<K, @NonNull String>}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Consumers of this annotation include:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>NullAway, which <a

              fluent(1, null, 2).index(Functions.constant("foo"));
        });
  }

  public void testUniqueIndex() {
    ImmutableMap<Integer, String> expected = ImmutableMap.of(3, "two", 5, "three", 4, "four");
    ImmutableMap<Integer, String> index =
        FluentIterable.from(asList("two", "three", "four"))
            .uniqueIndex(
                new Function<String, Integer>() {

    return ElementOrder.stable();
  }

  private static <N> ImmutableMap<N, GraphConnections<N, Presence>> getNodeConnections(
      Graph<N> graph) {
    // ImmutableMap.Builder maintains the order of the elements as inserted, so the map will have
    // whatever ordering the graph's nodes do, so ImmutableSortedMap is unnecessary even if the
    // input nodes are sorted.

  //  - The algorithm name is not case-sensitive.
  @SuppressWarnings("deprecation") // We still need to test our deprecated APIs.
  private static final ImmutableMap<String, HashFunction> ALGORITHMS =
      new ImmutableMap.Builder<String, HashFunction>()
          .put("MD5", md5())
          .put("SHA", sha1()) // Not the official name, but still works

 *       of the type argument supplied by the user of the class: For example, {@code
 *       ImmutableMap.get} returns {@code @Nullable E} because the method can return {@code null}
 *       even on an {@code ImmutableMap<K, @NonNull String>}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Consumers of this annotation include:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>NullAway, which <a

 *       of the type argument supplied by the user of the class: For example, {@code
 *       ImmutableMap.get} returns {@code @Nullable E} because the method can return {@code null}
 *       even on an {@code ImmutableMap<K, @NonNull String>}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Consumers of this annotation include:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>NullAway, which <a

 *       of the type argument supplied by the user of the class: For example, {@code
 *       ImmutableMap.get} returns {@code @Nullable E} because the method can return {@code null}
 *       even on an {@code ImmutableMap<K, @NonNull String>}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Consumers of this annotation include:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>NullAway, which <a