* Tasks execute with the same happens-before order that the function calls to {@link #submit} and
 * {@link #submitAsync} that submitted those tasks had.
 *
 * <p>This class has limited support for cancellation and other "early completions":
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>While calls to {@code submit} and {@code submitAsync} return a {@code Future} that can be

            throws ArtifactResolutionException {
        fireEvent(ResolutionListener.TEST_ARTIFACT, listeners, node);

        Object key = node.getKey();

        // TODO Does this check need to happen here? Had to add the same call
        // below when we iterate on child nodes -- will that suffice?
        if (managedVersions.containsKey(key)) {
            manageArtifact(node, managedVersions, listeners);
        }

			fmt.Fprintf(h, "%v", meta.XLV1)
			for _, part := range meta.Parts {
				fmt.Fprintf(h, "part.%d", part.Number)
				fmt.Fprintf(h, "part.%d", part.Size)
			}
			// Previously we checked if we had quorum on DataDir value.
			// We have removed this check to allow reading objects with different DataDir
			// values in a few drives (due to a rebalance-stop race bug)
			// provided their their etags or ModTimes match.

    Thread.sleep(500)
    server.send("Hello, WebSockets!")
    clientListener.assertTextMessage("Hello, WebSockets!")
    closeWebSockets(webSocket, server)
  }

  /**
   * We had a bug where web socket connections were leaked if the HTTP connection upgrade was not
   * successful. This test confirms that connections are released back to the connection pool!
   * https://github.com/square/okhttp/issues/4258

		}
		h.mutex.Lock()
		h.endTime = UTCNow()
		// Heal traversal is complete.
		if err == nil {
			// heal traversal succeeded.
			h.currentStatus.Summary = healFinishedStatus
		} else {
			// heal traversal had an error.
			h.currentStatus.Summary = healStoppedStatus
			h.currentStatus.FailureDetail = err.Error()
		}
		h.mutex.Unlock()
	case <-h.ctx.Done():
		h.mutex.Lock()
		h.endTime = UTCNow()

    Assumptions.assumeFalse(windows) // Can't deleteContents while the journal is open.

    filesystem.deleteRecursively(cacheDir)
    assertThat(cache["a"]).isNull()
  }

  /**
   * We had a long-lived bug where [DiskLruCache.trimToSize] could infinite loop if entries
   * being edited required deletion for the operation to complete.
   */
  @Test
  fun trimToSizeWithActiveEdit() {

	}

	err = os.RemoveAll(path.Join(fsDirs[0], bucket, object, "xl.meta"))
	if err != nil {
		t.Fatal(err)
	}

	// Write xl.meta with different modtime to simulate the case where a disk had
	// gone down when an object was replaced by a new object.
	fileInfoOutDated := fileInfoPreHeal
	fileInfoOutDated.ModTime = time.Now()
	err = disk.WriteMetadata(t.Context(), "", bucket, object, fileInfoOutDated)

 * Tasks execute with the same happens-before order that the function calls to {@link #submit} and
 * {@link #submitAsync} that submitted those tasks had.
 *
 * <p>This class has limited support for cancellation and other "early completions":
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>While calls to {@code submit} and {@code submitAsync} return a {@code Future} that can be

   * time for AbstractFutureState to potentially use them during class initialization.
   * (AbstractFutureState class initialization can log, and that logging could in theory call into
   * AbstractFuture, which wouldn't yet have had the chance to perform any class initialization of
   * its own.)
   */

  /** A special value to represent {@code null}. */
  static final Object NULL = new Object();

  /*

 * that is how the signature looked even prior to this comment! So naturally any change can break
 * existing users, but it can't *fix* existing users because any users who needed
 * `Function<@Nullable A, @Nullable B>` already had to find a workaround. Still, there is a *ton* of
 * fallout from trying to switch. I would be shocked if the switch would offer benefits to anywhere
 * near enough users to justify the costs.
 *