* @param <E> the type of elements held in this collection
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class MonitorBasedPriorityBlockingQueue<E> extends AbstractQueue<E>
    implements BlockingQueue<E> {

  // Based on revision 1.55 of PriorityBlockingQueue by Doug Lea, from
  // http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jsr166/src/main/java/util/concurrent/

  private static final long serialVersionUID = 5595510919245408276L;

---

"_**Netflix** is pleased to announce the open-source release of our **crisis management** orchestration framework: **Dispatch**! [built with **FastAPI**]_"

<div style="text-align: right; margin-right: 10%;">Kevin Glisson, Marc Vilanova, Forest Monsen - <strong>Netflix</strong> <a href="https://netflixtechblog.com/introducing-dispatch-da4b8a2a8072" target="_blank"><small>(ref)</small></a></div>

---

	// internal representation of version purge status
	VersionPurgeStatusInternal string
	VersionPurgeStatus         VersionPurgeStatusType

	replicationDecision string // internal representation of replication decision for use by DeleteObject handler
	// The total count of all versions of this object
	NumVersions int
	//  The modtime of the successor object version if any
	SuccessorModTime time.Time

   * one from the pool. We must take the pooled connection because by taking it from the pool, we've
   * fully acquired it.
   *
   * This test yields threads to force the decision of plan1 to be deliberate and not lucky. In
   * particular, we set up this sequence of events:
   *
   *  1. take plan 0
   *  3. plan 0 connects
   *  4. finish taking plan 1
   *

 *
 * <p>Advantages compared to {@code long[]}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>All the many well-known advantages of immutability (read <i>Effective Java</i>, third
 *       edition, Item 17).
 *   <li>Has the value-based (not identity-based) {@link #equals}, {@link #hashCode}, and {@link
 *       #toString} behavior you expect.

// TODO(kak): consider removing some of the @CanIgnoreReturnValue annotations as appropriate
@NullUnmarked
public class MonitorBasedArrayBlockingQueue<E> extends AbstractQueue<E>
    implements BlockingQueue<E> {

  // Based on revision 1.58 of ArrayBlockingQueue by Doug Lea, from
  // http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jsr166/src/main/java/util/concurrent/

  /** The queued items */
  final E[] items;

 *
 * <p>Advantages compared to {@code int[]}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>All the many well-known advantages of immutability (read <i>Effective Java</i>, third
 *       edition, Item 17).
 *   <li>Has the value-based (not identity-based) {@link #equals}, {@link #hashCode}, and {@link
 *       #toString} behavior you expect.

        response = spy(response);
        when(response.getHeaderStart()).thenReturn(0);

        // Write minimal SecurityDescriptor header (20 bytes)
        buffer[20] = 1; // Revision
        buffer[21] = 0; // Sbz1
        SMBUtil.writeInt2(0x8004, buffer, 22); // Control flags
        SMBUtil.writeInt4(0, buffer, 24); // Owner offset
        SMBUtil.writeInt4(0, buffer, 28); // Group offset

        assertViolations(result, 0, 0, 0);
    }

    @Test
    void testCiFriendlyRevision() throws Exception {
        SimpleProblemCollector result = validateRaw("raw-model/ok-ci-friendly-revision.xml");
        assertViolations(result, 0, 0, 0);
    }

    @Test
    void testCiFriendlyChangeList() throws Exception {

    feature.
*   Full new features (e.g., a new op implementing a cutting-edge algorithm)
    typically will live in
    [tensorflow/addons](https://github.com/tensorflow/addons) to get some
    airtime before a decision is made regarding whether they are to be migrated
    to the core.
*   As every PR requires several CPU/GPU hours of CI testing, we discourage
    submitting PRs to fix one typo, one warning,etc. We recommend fixing the