@Test
    @DisplayName("EmptyIterator should behave consistently across multiple calls")
    void testConsistentBehavior() {
        // When & Then - test multiple sequential calls
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            assertFalse(emptyIterator.hasNext(), "hasNext should consistently return false");
            assertNull(emptyIterator.next(), "next should consistently return null");
        }
    }

    @RepeatedTest(5)

                "false");

        assertFalse(Features.deployBuildPom(properties));
    }

    @Test
    void testConsistencyWithOtherFeatureMethodsFalse() {
        // Test that deployBuildPom behaves consistently with other feature methods when false
        Map<String, Object> properties = Map.of(
                Constants.MAVEN_DEPLOY_BUILD_POM, "false",
                Constants.MAVEN_CONSUMER_POM, "false");

        // This is expected behavior since they're created with the same configuration
        assertEquals(response1.toString(), response2.toString());
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("All write methods should consistently return 0")
    void testAllWriteMethodsReturnZero() {
        // Arrange
        byte[] buffer = new byte[100];

        // Act & Assert
        assertEquals(0, response.writeSetupWireFormat(buffer, 0));

        assertTrue(toStringResult.contains(message));
    }

    @Test
    public void test_getMessage_consistency() {
        // Test that getMessage returns the same value consistently
        String message = "Consistent message";
        UnsupportedSearchException exception = new UnsupportedSearchException(message);

        String firstCall = exception.getMessage();
        String secondCall = exception.getMessage();

   * consistently between their order within {@code valuesInExpectedOrder} and the order implied by
   * the given {@code comparator}.
   *
   * <p>In detail, this method asserts
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li><i>reflexivity</i>: {@code comparator.compare(t, t) = 0} for all {@code t} in {@code
   *       valuesInExpectedOrder}; and
   *   <li><i>consistency</i>: {@code comparator.compare(ti, tj) < 0} and {@code

Every effort will be made to handle the bug in as timely a manner as possible, however it's important that we

    @DisplayName("Test implementation consistency")
    void testImplementationConsistency() {
        // Given
        SmbNegotiationRequest consistentRequest = new TestSmbNegotiationRequest(true);

        // When & Then - verify consistency across multiple calls
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            assertTrue(consistentRequest.isSigningEnforced(), "Implementation should consistently return the same value");
        }

        }
    }

    @Test
    public void test_findOnMainSchema_alwaysReturnsNull() {
        // Since the implementation always returns null (no DBFlute classification used),
        // test that it consistently returns null for any input
        assertNull(invokeMethod(provider, "findOnMainSchema", "TestClassification"));
        assertNull(invokeMethod(provider, "findOnMainSchema", ""));

 * is not equivalent to the concatenation of their encoded form. Therefore, {@link
 * #putString(CharSequence, Charset)} should only be used consistently with <i>complete</i>
 * sequences and not broken into chunks.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 * @since 11.0
 */
@Beta
public interface Hasher extends PrimitiveSink {
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  @Override

        // Then - should be same instances
        assertSame(config1, config2, "Configuration should be consistent");
        assertSame(dfs1, dfs2, "DFS resolver should be consistent");
        assertSame(cache1, cache2, "Buffer cache should be consistent");
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Context should provide working resource creation")