*       add overloads that accept start and end indexes.
 *   <li>Access to all collection-based utilities via {@link #asList} (though at the cost of
 *       allocating garbage).
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Disadvantages compared to {@code int[]}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Memory footprint has a fixed overhead (about 24 bytes per instance).

  TFE_DEVICE_PLACEMENT_EXPLICIT = 0,
  // Copy the tensor to the right device but log a warning.
  TFE_DEVICE_PLACEMENT_WARN = 1,
  // Silently copy the tensor, which has a performance cost since the operation
  // will be blocked till the copy completes. This is the default placement
  // policy.
  TFE_DEVICE_PLACEMENT_SILENT = 2,
  // Placement policy which silently copies int32 tensors but not other dtypes.

</details>

### Esegui il server

Puoi far partire il server così:

<div class="termy">

```console
$ uvicorn main:app --reload

INFO:     Uvicorn running on http://127.0.0.1:8000 (Press CTRL+C to quit)
INFO:     Started reloader process [28720]

   * {@code long} value {@code 0x1213141516171819L}.
   *
   * <p>Arguably, it's preferable to use {@link java.nio.ByteBuffer}; that library exposes much more
   * flexibility at little cost in readability.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code bytes} has fewer than 8 elements
   */
  public static long fromByteArray(byte[] bytes) {

# disable_pgv: disables protoc-gen-validation. This is not used buts adds many MB to Envoy protos
# not set vtprotobuf: this adds some performance improvement, but at a binary cost increase that is not worth it for the agent
AGENT_TAGS=agent,disable_pgv
# disable_pgv: disables protoc-gen-validation. This is not used buts adds many MB to Envoy protos
# vtprotobuf: enables optimized protobuf marshalling.

 *       add overloads that accept start and end indexes.
 *   <li>Access to all collection-based utilities via {@link #asList} (though at the cost of
 *       allocating garbage).
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Disadvantages compared to {@code double[]}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Memory footprint has a fixed overhead (about 24 bytes per instance).

  /**
   * This neat test shows that no matter what weights we use in our requests, if we push X amount of
   * permits in a cool state, where X = rate * timeToCoolDown, and we have specified a
   * timeToWarmUp() period, it will cost as the prescribed amount of time. E.g., calling
   * [acquire(5), acquire(1)] takes exactly the same time as [acquire(2), acquire(3), acquire(1)].
   */
  public void testTimeToWarmUpIsHonouredEvenWithWeights() {

    # the default MCP is assumed.
    configSource:
      subscribedResources: []

    # The following is used to limit how long a sidecar can be connected
    # to a pilot. It balances out load across pilot instances at the cost of
    # increasing system churn.
    keepaliveMaxServerConnectionAge: 30m

    # Additional labels to apply to the deployment.
    deploymentLabels: {}

    ## Mesh config settings

   * 0x12131415}.
   *
   * <p>Arguably, it's preferable to use {@link java.nio.ByteBuffer}; that library exposes much more
   * flexibility at little cost in readability.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code bytes} has fewer than 4 elements
   */
  public static int fromByteArray(byte[] bytes) {

        "code": {
          "language": "plaintext",
          "showLineNumbers": false,
          "showMiniMap": false
        },