// ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    //
    // p1 inherits from p0
    // p0 inherits from super model
    //
    // or we can show it graphically as:
    //
    // p1 ---> p0 --> super model
    //
    // ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    @Test
    void testDependencyManagement() throws Exception {

)

// printSecretItemsTabular prints the secret in table format
func (w *sdsWriter) printSecretItemsTabular(secrets []SecretItem) error {
	if len(secrets) == 0 {
		fmt.Fprintln(w.w, "No secret items to show.")
		return nil
	}
	tw := new(tabwriter.Writer).Init(w.w, 0, 5, 5, ' ', 0)
	fmt.Fprintln(tw, strings.Join(secretItemColumns, "\t"))
	for _, s := range secrets {
		if includeConfigType {

    // ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    //
    // p1 inherits from p0
    // p0 inherits from super model
    //
    // or we can show it graphically as:
    //
    // p1 ---> p0 --> super model
    //
    // ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    @Test
    void testDependencyManagement() throws Exception {

    // ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    //
    // p1 inherits from p0
    // p0 inherits from super model
    //
    // or we can show it graphically as:
    //
    // p1 ---> p0 --> super model
    //
    // ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    @Test
    void testProjectInheritance() throws Exception {

      description: If so, how does this differ from previous error handling proposals?
      placeholder: |
       Yes or No

       If yes, 
        1.how does this differ from previous error handling proposals?

    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    id: generics-proposal
    attributes:
      label: Is this about generics?

    // ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    //
    // p1 inherits from p0
    // p0 inherits from super model
    //
    // or we can show it graphically as:
    //
    // p1 ---> p0 --> super model
    //
    // p1 has a depMgmt section that specifies versions 1.0 of jars "a" & "b"
    // jar "a" has a transitive dependency on 2.0 of jar "b", but maven should

		Free:   uint64(s.Frsize) * s.Bavail,
		Files:  s.Files,
		Ffree:  s.Ffree,
		FSType: getFSType(s.Type),
	}
	// Check for overflows.
	// https://github.com/minio/minio/issues/8035
	// XFS can show wrong values at times error out
	// in such scenarios.
	if info.Free > info.Total {
		return info, fmt.Errorf("detected free space (%d) > total drive space (%d), fs corruption at (%s). please run 'fsck'", info.Free, info.Total, path)

But I'll show you how to improve that next. 🤓

## Custom Operation IDs and Better Method Names

You can **modify** the way these operation IDs are **generated** to make them simpler and have **simpler method names** in the clients.

It can be configured via MinIO's standard configuration API (i.e. using `mc admin config set/get`), or equivalently with environment variables. For brevity we show only environment variables here:

```sh
$ mc admin config set myminio identity_plugin --env
KEY:
identity_plugin  enable Identity Plugin via external hook

ARGS:

    //
    // p4 inherits from p3
    // p3 inherits from p2
    // p2 inherits from p1
    // p1 inherits from p0
    // p0 inherits from super model
    //
    // or we can show it graphically as:
    //
    // p4 ---> p3 ---> p2 ---> p1 ---> p0 --> super model
    //
    // ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    @Test