* (so much for "black box") and try instances that both do and don't pass the check. The "don't"
   * half of that is more awkward to arrange...
   */
  private static <T> Iterable<T> iterable(final Collection<T> collection) {
    // return collection::iterator;
    return new Iterable<T>() {
      @Override
      public Iterator<T> iterator() {

   * (so much for "black box") and try instances that both do and don't pass the check. The "don't"
   * half of that is more awkward to arrange...
   */
  private static <T> Iterable<T> iterable(final Collection<T> collection) {
    // return collection::iterator;
    return new Iterable<T>() {
      @Override
      public Iterator<T> iterator() {

   * (so much for "black box") and try instances that both do and don't pass the check. The "don't"
   * half of that is more awkward to arrange...
   */
  private static <T> Iterable<T> iterable(final Collection<T> collection) {
    // return collection::iterator;
    return new Iterable<T>() {
      @Override
      public Iterator<T> iterator() {

   * (so much for "black box") and try instances that both do and don't pass the check. The "don't"
   * half of that is more awkward to arrange...
   */
  private static <T> Iterable<T> iterable(final Collection<T> collection) {
    // return collection::iterator;
    return new Iterable<T>() {
      @Override
      public Iterator<T> iterator() {

      <resource>
        <directory>src</directory>
      </resource>
      <!-- src-super is copied to guava-gwt-sources (so that we can strip its @Nullable annotations), so we don't need to list it here. We may want to arrange something similar for test-super someday. -->
      <!-- TODO(cpovirk): Why do we have separate src and src-super directories, anyway? -->
      <resource>

	// It is the caller's responsibility to arrange for it to be
	// freed, such as by calling C.free (be sure to include stdlib.h
	// if C.free is needed).
	func C.CString(string) *C.char

	// Go []byte slice to C array
	// The C array is allocated in the C heap using malloc.
	// It is the caller's responsibility to arrange for it to be
	// freed, such as by calling C.free (be sure to include stdlib.h

 * well as a simple framework for helping to make sure that assertions failing in generated threads
 * cause the associated test that generated them to itself fail (which JUnit does not otherwise
 * arrange). The rules for creating such tests are:
 *
 * <ol>
 *   <li>All assertions in code running in generated threads must use the forms {@link #threadFail},

 * well as a simple framework for helping to make sure that assertions failing in generated threads
 * cause the associated test that generated them to itself fail (which JUnit does not otherwise
 * arrange). The rules for creating such tests are:
 *
 * <ol>
 *   <li>All assertions in code running in generated threads must use the forms {@link #threadFail},

<code>R15</code> points to the stack frame and should typically only be accessed using the
virtual registers <code>SP</code> and <code>FP</code>.
</p>

<p>
Load- and store-multiple instructions operate on a range of registers.
The range of registers is specified by a start register and an end register.
For example, <code>LMG</code> <code>(R9),</code> <code>R5,</code> <code>R7</code> would load

		for _, a := range dt.ParamType {
			p.recordTypedefs1(a, pos, visited)
		}
	case *dwarf.StructType:
		for _, f := range dt.Field {
			p.recordTypedefs1(f.Type, pos, visited)
		}
	}
}

// prepareNames finalizes the Kind field of not-type names and sets
// the mangled name of all names.
func (p *Package) prepareNames(f *File) {
	for _, n := range f.Name {
		if n.Kind == "not-type" {