required: true
  - type: textarea
    id: what-did-you-do
    attributes:
      label: "What did you do?"
      description: "If possible, provide a recipe for reproducing the error. A complete runnable program is good. A link on [go.dev/play](https://go.dev/play) is better. A failing unit test is the best."
    validations:
      required: true
  - type: textarea
    id: actual-behavior
    attributes:

		mask := byte(int32(^t) >> 31)
		b := payload[len(payload)-1-i]
		good &^= mask&paddingLen ^ mask&b
	}

	// We AND together the bits of good and replicate the result across
	// all the bits.
	good &= good << 4
	good &= good << 2
	good &= good << 1
	good = uint8(int8(good) >> 7)

	// Zero the padding length on error. This ensures any unchecked bytes

                        return "good";
                    }

                    public String getNotAnnotated() {
                        return null;
                    }
                }

                public static class NamedBean implements Named {
                    @Input
                    public String getGood() {
                        return "good";
                    }

We may ask you to answer these questions directly in the GitHub issue or (for large changes) in a shared Google Doc.

If you are looking for good first issues, take a look at the list of [good first issues](https://github.com/gradle/gradle/labels/good%20first%20issue) that should be actionable and ready for a contribution.

### Security vulnerabilities

cd "$(dirname "$0")"

if is_continuous_or_release || [[ -z "$KOKORO_BUILD_ID" ]]; then
  # A continuous job is the only one to publish to latest
  TAG="latest-multi-python"
else
  # If it is a change, grab a good tag for iterative builds
  if [[ -z "${KOKORO_GITHUB_PULL_REQUEST_NUMBER}" ]]; then
    TAG=$(head -n 1 "$KOKORO_PIPER_DIR/presubmit_request.txt" | cut -d" " -f2)
  else
    TAG="pr-${KOKORO_GITHUB_PULL_REQUEST_NUMBER}"
  fi

				return claim
			}(),
		},
		"good-parameters": {
			claim: func() *resource.ResourceClaim {
				claim := testClaim(goodName, goodNS, goodClaimSpec)
				claim.Spec.ParametersRef = &resource.ResourceClaimParametersReference{
					Kind: "foo",
					Name: "bar",
				}
				return claim
			}(),
		},
		"good-parameters-apigroup": {
			claim: func() *resource.ResourceClaim {

    - p: ^gomega\.BeTrue$
      pkg: ^github.com/onsi/gomega$
      msg: "it does not produce a good failure message - use BeTrueBecause with an explicit printf-style failure message instead, or plain Go: if ... { ginkgo.Fail(...) }"
    - p: ^gomega\.BeFalse$
      pkg: ^github.com/onsi/gomega$

		t.Fatalf("Signal got err %v, want nil", err)
	}

	// Verify we actually received the signal.
	select {
	case <-time.After(1 * time.Second):
		t.Error("timeout waiting for signal")
	case <-c:
		// Good
	}
}

func TestProcessReleaseTwice(t *testing.T) {
	testenv.MustHaveGoBuild(t)
	t.Parallel()

	r, w, err := os.Pipe()
	if err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("Pipe() got err %v, want nil", err)
	}

	// We quit when we get a match that's at least nice long
	nice := len(win) - pos
	if d.nice < nice {
		nice = d.nice
	}

	// If we've got a match that's good enough, only look in 1/4 the chain.
	tries := d.chain
	length = prevLength
	if length >= d.good {
		tries >>= 2
	}

	wEnd := win[pos+length]
	wPos := win[pos:]
	minIndex := pos - windowSize

	for i := prevHead; tries > 0; tries-- {

	// We don't parse the GODEBUG environment variable, because
	// (a) it's tricky to do so in a manner that is consistent
	//     with the godebug package; in particular, a simple
	//     substring check is not good enough. The value is a
	//     rightmost-wins list of options. But more importantly:
	// (b) it is impossible to detect changes to the effective
	//     setting caused by os.Setenv("GODEBUG"), as happens in