You usually don't get the achievable performance gains on the first try, see <<build_cache_debugging.adoc#finding_problems,finding problems with task output caching>>.
As your build logic is evolving and changing it is also important to make sure that the cache effectiveness is not regressing.

        then:
        toolchain.isPresent()
        toolchain.get().metadata.vendor.knownVendor == JvmVendor.KnownJvmVendor.IBM
        toolchain.get().vendor == "IBM"
    }

    def "ignores invalid toolchains when finding a matching one"() {
        given:
        def queryService = setupInstallations(["8.0", "8.0.242.hs-adpt", "8.0.broken"])

        when:
        def filter = createSpec()

			completed.GenericServerRunOptions.ExternalHost = completed.GenericServerRunOptions.AdvertiseAddress.String()
		} else {
			hostname, err := os.Hostname()
			if err != nil {
				return CompletedOptions{}, fmt.Errorf("error finding host name: %v", err)
			}
			completed.GenericServerRunOptions.ExternalHost = hostname
		}
		klog.Infof("external host was not specified, using %v", completed.GenericServerRunOptions.ExternalHost)
	}

			expectedEvents:  noevents,
			errors:          noerrors,
			test:            wrapTestWithProvisionCalls([]provisionCall{}, testSyncClaim),
		},
		{
			// volume provision for PVC scheduled
			"11-23 - skip finding PV and provision for PVC annotated with AnnSelectedNode",
			newVolumeArray("volume11-23", "1Gi", "", "", v1.VolumeAvailable, v1.PersistentVolumeReclaimDelete, classCopper),
			[]*v1.PersistentVolume{

	}
	templates, err := b.injectionTemplates()
	if err != nil {
		// deal with this when we call Build() to avoid making the New signature unwieldy
		b.errs = multierror.Append(b.errs, fmt.Errorf("failed finding injection templates on clusters %v", err))
	}
	b.templates = templates

	return b.WithClusters(clusters...)
}

type builder struct {
	ctx resource.Context

		t.Logf("Missing expected secret paths:\n%s", strings.Join(sets.List[string](missingPaths), "\n"))
		t.Error("Missing expected secret paths. Verify VisitPodSecretNames() is correctly finding the missing paths, then correct expectedSecretPaths")
	}
	if extraPaths := secretPaths.Difference(expectedSecretPaths); len(extraPaths) > 0 {
		t.Logf("Extra secret paths:\n%s", strings.Join(sets.List[string](extraPaths), "\n"))

		if start == notSetYet {
			start = cur
		}
		most = max(most, cur)
		// Final region that might span to next uint64
		cur = l
	}
	if start == notSetYet {
		// Made it all the way through without finding a single 1 bit.
		const n = uint(64 * len(b))
		return packPallocSum(n, n, n)
	}
	most = max(most, cur)

	if most >= 64-2 {
		// There is no way an internal run of zeros could beat max.

            mlir::dyn_cast_or_null<StringAttr>(attribute.getValue());
        string_attr != nullptr &&
        string_attr.getValue() == kNullAttributeValue) {
      continue;
    }

    if (std::find_if(
            attr_to_op_map.begin(), attr_to_op_map.end(), [&](auto attr_op) {
              return std::get<0>(attr_op).getName() == attribute.getName();
            }) == attr_to_op_map.end()) {

		// a distinct Package.
		return nil
	}

	restrictionFiles, err := recursiveRead(filepath.Join(pkgDir, rulesFileName))
	if err != nil {
		return []error{fmt.Errorf("error finding rules file: %w", err)}
	}
	if len(restrictionFiles) == 0 {
		return nil
	}

	klog.V(2).Infof("verifying pkg %q (%s)", pkg.PkgPath, pkgDir)
	var errs []error

		volume, err := ctrl.volumes.findBestMatchForClaim(claim, delayBinding)
		if err != nil {
			logger.V(2).Info("Synchronizing unbound PersistentVolumeClaim, Error finding PV for claim", "PVC", klog.KObj(claim), "err", err)
			return fmt.Errorf("error finding PV for claim %q: %w", claimToClaimKey(claim), err)
		}
		if volume == nil {