* worker, and then the first thread's call to delegate.execute() returns. Without this counter,
   * it would observe the QUEUING state and set it to QUEUED, and the worker would never be
   * scheduled again for future submissions.
   */
  @GuardedBy("queue")
  private long workerRunCount = 0;

  @RetainedWith private final QueueWorker worker = new QueueWorker();

  /** Use {@link MoreExecutors#newSequentialExecutor} */

   * concurrency than full synchronization. Defaults to 4.
   *
   * <p><b>Note:</b> Prior to Guava release 9.0, the default was 16. It is possible the default will
   * change again in the future. If you care about this value, you should always choose it
   * explicitly.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code concurrencyLevel} is nonpositive

   * prevent us from selecting our {@code SafeAtomicHelper} strategy.
   *
   * <p>Stashing this in a static field avoids loading it over and over again and speeds up test
   * execution significantly.
   */
  private static final ClassLoader NO_ATOMIC_FIELD_UPDATER =
      getClassLoader(
          ImmutableSet.of(
              AtomicIntegerFieldUpdater.class.getName(),

рф

// xn--wgbl6a ("Qatar", Arabic) : QA
// http://www.ict.gov.qa/
قطر

// xn--mgberp4a5d4ar ("AlSaudiah", Arabic) : SA
// http://www.nic.net.sa/
السعودية

// xn--mgberp4a5d4a87g ("AlSaudiah", Arabic, variant)  : SA
السعودیة

// xn--mgbqly7c0a67fbc ("AlSaudiah", Arabic, variant) : SA
السعودیۃ

// xn--mgbqly7cvafr ("AlSaudiah", Arabic, variant) : SA
السعوديه

This is very useful when you need to:

* Have shared logic (the same code logic again and again).
* Share database connections.
* Enforce security, authentication, role requirements, etc.
* And many other things...

All these, while minimizing code repetition.

## First Steps

    requestSendStarted: Boolean,
  ): Boolean {
    // The application layer has forbidden retries.
    if (!client.retryOnConnectionFailure) return false

    // We can't send the request body again.
    if (requestSendStarted && requestIsOneShot(e, userRequest)) return false

    // This exception is fatal.
    if (!isRecoverable(e, requestSendStarted)) return false

    // No more routes to attempt.

		n = len(b)
	}

again:
	nextOut, ok := w.buffer[w.nextOffset]
	if ok {
		n, err = w.w.Write(nextOut)
		delete(w.buffer, w.nextOffset)
		w.nextOffset += int64(n)
		if n != len(nextOut) {
			return 0, fmt.Errorf("expected write size %d but wrote %d bytes", len(nextOut), n)
		}
		if err != nil {
			return 0, err
		}
		goto again
	}

	return len(b), nil
}

            exit 1;
          fi
        env:
          TAR_BALL: apache-maven/target/apache-maven-bin.tar.gz

      - name: Clean with Maven
        run: mvn clean

      - name: Build again with Maven SNAPSHOT
        shell: bash
        run: |
          set +e
          export PATH=${{ env.TEMP_MAVEN_BIN_DIR }}:$PATH

 *
 * <p>The {@code Iterable} specification does not make it absolutely clear what should happen on a
 * second invocation, so implementors have made various choices, including:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>returning the same iterator again
 *   <li>throwing an exception of some kind
 *   <li>or the usual, <i>robust</i> behavior, which all known {@link Collection} implementations
 *       have, of returning a new, independent iterator
 * </ul>
 *

    checkThreadPoolName(thread2, 2);
    assertEquals(
        thread.getName().substring(0, thread.getName().lastIndexOf('-')),
        thread2.getName().substring(0, thread.getName().lastIndexOf('-')));

    // Building again should give us a different pool ID.
    ThreadFactory threadFactory2 = builder.build();
    Thread thread3 = threadFactory2.newThread(monitoredRunnable);
    checkThreadPoolName(thread3, 1);