import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * Base class for JSR166 Junit TCK tests. Defines some constants, utility methods and classes, as
 * well as a simple framework for helping to make sure that assertions failing in generated threads
 * cause the associated test that generated them to itself fail (which JUnit does not otherwise
 * arrange). The rules for creating such tests are:
 *
 * <ol>

   *
   * TODO(b/218700094): Does this matter to prod users, or is it just a feature of our testing
   * environment? If the latter, maybe write a custom Executor that avoids failing the test when it
   * sees an Error?
   */
  @AndroidIncompatible
  public void testTaskThrowsError() throws Exception {
    class MyError extends Error {}
    final CyclicBarrier barrier = new CyclicBarrier(2);

![Administrationsoberfläche](https://fess.codelibs.org/_images/fess_admin_dashboard.png)

Sie können in der Administrationsoberfläche (Web, Datei, Datenspeicher) Crawling-Ziele in den Crawler-Konfigurationsseiten registrieren und den Crawler manuell auf der [Scheduler-Seite](https://fess.codelibs.org/14.17/admin/scheduler-guide.html) starten.

## Migration von einem anderen Suchanbieter

          </association>
        </field>
      </fields>
      <comment>We could probably have a specific element for a dev mailing list for things like CI,
        and maybe even a specific element for the user and scm mailing lists. Then leave the more
        lose structure for any other type of mailing list.</comment>
      <codeSegments>
        <codeSegment>
          <version>4.0.0+</version>
          <code>

      means any form of electronic, verbal, or written communication sent
      to the Licensor or its representatives, including but not limited to
      communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control systems,
      and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the
      Licensor for the purpose of discussing and improving the Work, but

   *
   * TODO(b/218700094): Does this matter to prod users, or is it just a feature of our testing
   * environment? If the latter, maybe write a custom Executor that avoids failing the test when it
   * sees an Error?
   */
  @AndroidIncompatible
  public void testTaskThrowsError() throws Exception {
    class MyError extends Error {}
    final CyclicBarrier barrier = new CyclicBarrier(2);

import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * Base class for JSR166 Junit TCK tests. Defines some constants, utility methods and classes, as
 * well as a simple framework for helping to make sure that assertions failing in generated threads
 * cause the associated test that generated them to itself fail (which JUnit does not otherwise
 * arrange). The rules for creating such tests are:
 *
 * <ol>

      means any form of electronic, verbal, or written communication sent
      to the Licensor or its representatives, including but not limited to
      communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control systems,
      and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the
      Licensor for the purpose of discussing and improving the Work, but

    assertEquals(I18N, writer2.toString());
    assertEquals(I18N.length(), copied);
  }

  /**
   * Test for Guava issue 1061: https://github.com/google/guava/issues/1061
   *
   * <p>CharStreams.copy was failing to clear its CharBuffer after each read call, which effectively
   * reduced the available size of the buffer each time a call to read didn't fill up the available

    assertEquals(I18N, writer2.toString());
    assertEquals(I18N.length(), copied);
  }

  /**
   * Test for Guava issue 1061: https://github.com/google/guava/issues/1061
   *
   * <p>CharStreams.copy was failing to clear its CharBuffer after each read call, which effectively
   * reduced the available size of the buffer each time a call to read didn't fill up the available