* longer be the case.)
     *
     * javax.naming.Name and java.util.concurrent.Delayed might work, but
     * they're fairly obscure, we've invented our own interface and class.
     */
    Interface a = new Impl();
    Interface b = new Impl();
    ImmutableSortedSet<Interface> set = ImmutableSortedSet.of(a, b);
    Object[] unused1 = set.toArray();

   * String a3 = peekingIterator.next(); // also returns "a"
   * }</pre>
   *
   * <p>Any structural changes to the underlying iteration (aside from those performed by the
   * iterator's own {@link PeekingIterator#remove()} method) will leave the iterator in an undefined
   * state.
   *
   * <p>The returned iterator does not support removal after peeking, as explained by {@link
   * PeekingIterator#remove()}.

    assertNull(getMap().get(k1()));
    assertEquals(k1(), getMap().inverse().get(null));
    assertEquals(1, getMap().size());
  }

  // nb: inverse is run through its own entire suite

  @MapFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_PUT)
  @CollectionSize.Require(ZERO)
  public void testInversePut() {
    getMap().put(k0(), v0());
    getMap().inverse().put(v1(), k1());

  private static class ConflictingRequirementsExampleDerivedInterfaceTester
      extends ExampleBaseInterfaceTester {}

  public void testTestFeatureEnums() throws Exception {
    // Haha! Let's test our own test rig!
    FeatureEnumTest.assertGoodFeatureEnum(FeatureUtilTest.ExampleBaseFeature.class);
    FeatureEnumTest.assertGoodFeatureEnum(FeatureUtilTest.ExampleDerivedFeature.class);
  }

 *   <li>It is easy for the user to ensure that listeners are never invoked while holding locks.
 * </ul>
 *
 * The last point is subtle. Often the observable object will be managing its own internal state
 * using a lock, however it is dangerous to dispatch listeners while holding a lock because they
 * might run on the {@code directExecutor()} or be otherwise re-entrant (call back into your

     * Wrapper<Number>, Wrapper<Integer>, Wrapper<@Nullable Integer>, etc. If we used just
     * Equivalence<? super T> below, no type could satisfy both that bound and T's own
     * bound. With this type, they have some overlap: in our example, Equivalence<Number>
     * and Equivalence<Object>.
     */
    private final Equivalence<? super @NonNull T> equivalence;

     * Wrapper<Number>, Wrapper<Integer>, Wrapper<@Nullable Integer>, etc. If we used just
     * Equivalence<? super T> below, no type could satisfy both that bound and T's own
     * bound. With this type, they have some overlap: in our example, Equivalence<Number>
     * and Equivalence<Object>.
     */
    private final Equivalence<? super @NonNull T> equivalence;

   */
  public static double factorial(int n) {
    checkNonNegative("n", n);
    if (n > MAX_FACTORIAL) {
      return Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY;
    } else {
      // Multiplying the last (n & 0xf) values into their own accumulator gives a more accurate
      // result than multiplying by everySixteenthFactorial[n >> 4] directly.
      double accum = 1.0;
      for (int i = 1 + (n & ~0xf); i <= n; i++) {
        accum *= i;
      }

            lines could make c.g.c.base.testModule transitively inherit from extra modules. If some
            of those modules are ones that it uses but forgets to list in its own <inherits>, we'd
            like to get an error. Currently we do, but if we add the extra <inherits> lines, we
            won't.

   * String a3 = peekingIterator.next(); // also returns "a"
   * }</pre>
   *
   * <p>Any structural changes to the underlying iteration (aside from those performed by the
   * iterator's own {@link PeekingIterator#remove()} method) will leave the iterator in an undefined
   * state.
   *
   * <p>The returned iterator does not support removal after peeking, as explained by {@link
   * PeekingIterator#remove()}.