* reached, but not the other, the shorter iterable is considered to be less than the longer one.
   * For example, a lexicographical natural ordering over integers considers {@code [] < [1] < [1,
   * 1] < [1, 2] < [2]}.
   *
   * <p>Note that {@code Collections.reverseOrder(lexicographical(comparator))} is not equivalent to

      return 0;
    }
    return (weigher == null) ? maximumSize : maximumWeight;
  }

  // Make a safe contravariant cast now so we don't have to do it over and over.
  @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
  <K1 extends K, V1 extends V> Weigher<K1, V1> getWeigher() {
    return (Weigher<K1, V1>) MoreObjects.firstNonNull(weigher, OneWeigher.INSTANCE);
  }

  /**

    out.close();
  }

  @Override
  public synchronized void flush() throws IOException {
    out.flush();
  }

  /**
   * Checks if writing {@code len} bytes would go over threshold, and switches to file buffering if
   * so.
   */
  @GuardedBy("this")
  private void update(int len) throws IOException {
    if (memory != null && (memory.getCount() + len > fileThreshold)) {

  }

  /*
   * TODO: if we're testing a list, we could check indexOf(). (Doing it in
   * AbstractListTester isn't enough because many tests that run on lists don't
   * extends AbstractListTester.) We could also iterate over all elements to
   * verify absence
   */
  protected void expectMissing(E... elements) {
    for (E element : elements) {
      assertFalse("Should not contain " + element, actualContents().contains(element));
    }

    } catch (NullPointerException expected) {
    }
  }

  /**
   * Verify thread safety by using a collection whose size() may be inconsistent with the actual
   * number of elements and whose elements may change over time.
   *
   * <p>This test might fail in GWT because the GWT emulations might count on the input collection
   * not to change during the copy. It is safe to do so in GWT because javascript is
   * single-threaded.

    } catch (NullPointerException expected) {
    }
  }

  /**
   * Verify thread safety by using a collection whose size() may be inconsistent with the actual
   * number of elements and whose elements may change over time.
   *
   * <p>This test might fail in GWT because the GWT emulations might count on the input collection
   * not to change during the copy. It is safe to do so in GWT because javascript is
   * single-threaded.

  /**
   * Returns {@code true} if a character sequence contains at least one matching BMP character.
   * Equivalent to {@code !matchesNoneOf(sequence)}.
   *
   * <p>The default implementation iterates over the sequence, invoking {@link #matches} for each
   * character, until this returns {@code true} or the end is reached.
   *
   * @param sequence the character sequence to examine, possibly empty

      return fromCollection.size();
    }
  }

  /**
   * Returns {@code true} if the collection {@code self} contains all of the elements in the
   * collection {@code c}.
   *
   * <p>This method iterates over the specified collection {@code c}, checking each element returned
   * by the iterator in turn to see if it is contained in the specified collection {@code self}. If

   * checkNotNull *should* be annotated to require it to be non-null.
   *
   * However, for a variety of reasons, Google developers have written a ton of code over the past
   * decade that assumes that they can use checkNotNull for non-precondition checks. I had hoped to
   * take a principled stand on this, but the amount of such code is simply overwhelming. To avoid

      }
    }

    return fromMapEntries(multimap.asMap().entrySet(), valueComparator);
  }

  /**
   * Returns an immutable multimap containing the specified entries. The returned multimap iterates
   * over keys in the order they were first encountered in the input, and the values for each key
   * are iterated in the order they were encountered. If two values for the same key are {@linkplain