*
 * @author Jon Perlow
 * @author Martin Buchholz
 * @author Clément Roux
 */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)
public class Utf8Test extends TestCase {

  private static final ImmutableList<String> ILL_FORMED_STRINGS;

  static {
    ImmutableList.Builder<String> builder = ImmutableList.builder();
    char[] surrogates = {
      MAX_LOW_SURROGATE, MAX_HIGH_SURROGATE, MIN_LOW_SURROGATE, MIN_HIGH_SURROGATE,
    };

 * (The same goes for the message-accepting overloads.)
 *
 * <h3>Only {@code %s} is supported</h3>
 *
 * <p>{@code Preconditions} uses {@link Strings#lenientFormat} to format error message template
 * strings. This only supports the {@code "%s"} specifier, not the full range of {@link
 * java.util.Formatter} specifiers. However, note that if the number of arguments does not match the

  public void testEqualsIgnoreCaseUnicodeEquivalence() {
    // Note that it's possible in future that the JDK's idea to toUpperCase() or equalsIgnoreCase()
    // may change and break assumptions in this test [*]. This is not a bug in the implementation of
    // Ascii.equalsIgnoreCase(), but it is a signal that its documentation may need updating as
    // regards edge cases.

  static TestSuite tests(String name, ByteSourceFactory factory, boolean testAsCharSource) {
    TestSuite suite = new TestSuite(name);
    for (Entry<String, String> entry : TEST_STRINGS.entrySet()) {
      if (testAsCharSource) {
        suite.addTest(suiteForString(factory, entry.getValue(), name, entry.getKey()));
      } else {
        suite.addTest(
            suiteForBytes(

    ImmutableSet<String> set = this.<String>builder().addAll(a).addAll(b).build();
    assertThat(set).containsExactly("a", "b", "c", "d", "e").inOrder();
  }

  static final int LAST_COLOR_ADDED = 0x00BFFF;

  public void testComplexBuilder() {
    List<Integer> colorElem = asList(0x00, 0x33, 0x66, 0x99, 0xCC, 0xFF);
    // javac won't compile this without "this.<Integer>"

    ImmutableSet<String> set = this.<String>builder().addAll(a).addAll(b).build();
    assertThat(set).containsExactly("a", "b", "c", "d", "e").inOrder();
  }

  static final int LAST_COLOR_ADDED = 0x00BFFF;

  public void testComplexBuilder() {
    List<Integer> colorElem = asList(0x00, 0x33, 0x66, 0x99, 0xCC, 0xFF);
    // javac won't compile this without "this.<Integer>"

      // surrogate range. Either way the character range is empty.
      this.safeMinChar = Character.MAX_VALUE;
      this.safeMaxChar = 0;
    } else {
      // The safe range is non-empty and contains values below the surrogate
      // range but may extend above it. We may need to clip the maximum value.
      this.safeMinChar = (char) safeMin;
      this.safeMaxChar = (char) Math.min(safeMax, Character.MIN_HIGH_SURROGATE - 1);
    }

  }

  final boolean supportsFastOffset;

  /** Constructor for use by subclasses. */
  protected DiscreteDomain() {
    this(false);
  }

  /** Private constructor for built-in DiscreteDomains supporting fast offset. */
  private DiscreteDomain(boolean supportsFastOffset) {
    this.supportsFastOffset = supportsFastOffset;
  }

  /**

  private final int end; // exclusive

  private ImmutableIntArray(int[] array) {
    this(array, 0, array.length);
  }

  private ImmutableIntArray(int[] array, int start, int end) {
    this.array = array;
    this.start = start;
    this.end = end;
  }

  /** Returns the number of values in this array. */
  public int length() {

    this.features = Helpers.copyToSet(features);
    this.expectedElements = Helpers.copyToList(expectedElements);
    this.knownOrder = knownOrder;
    this.startIndex = startIndex;
  }

  /**
   * I'd like to make this a parameter to the constructor, but I can't because the stimulus
   * instances refer to {@code this}.
   */