*/
    fun eventListenerFactory(eventListenerFactory: EventListener.Factory) =
      apply {
        this.eventListenerFactory = eventListenerFactory
      }

    /**
     * Configure this client to retry or not when a connectivity problem is encountered. By default,
     * this client silently recovers from the following problems:
     *
     * * **Unreachable IP addresses.** If the URL's host has multiple IP addresses,

    val snapshot = cache["b"]!!
    snapshot.close()
    assertThat(cache.edit("d")).isNull()
    assertThat(taskFaker.isIdle()).isFalse()

    // On cache misses, no retry job is queued.
    assertThat(cache["c"]).isNull()
    assertThat(taskFaker.isIdle()).isFalse()

    // Let the rebuild complete successfully.

    e is InterruptedIOException -> false

    // If the problem was a CertificateException from the X509TrustManager, do not retry.
    e is SSLHandshakeException && e.cause is CertificateException -> false

    // e.g. a certificate pinning error.
    e is SSLPeerUnverifiedException -> false

    // Retry for all other SSL failures.
    e is SSLException -> true

    else -> false
  }

    id: String?,
    type: String?,
    data: String,
  ) {
    listener.onEvent(this, id, type, data)
  }

  override fun onRetryChange(timeMs: Long) {
    // Ignored. We do not auto-retry.
  }

      // the journal rebuild failed, the journal writer will not be active, meaning we will not be
      // able to record the edit, causing file leaks. In both cases, we want to retry the clean up
      // so we can get out of this state!
      cleanupQueue.schedule(cleanupTask)
      return null
    }

    // Flush the journal before creating files to prevent file leaks.

      // 408's are a bit of an outlier because we may repeat the request if we encounter this
      // response code. In this scenario, there are 2 responses: the initial 408 and then the 200
      // because of the retry. We just want to ensure the initial 408 isn't cached.
      expectedResponseCode = 200
      server.enqueue(
        MockResponse.Builder()
          .setHeader("Cache-Control", "no-store")
          .body("FGHIJ")

  override fun connectTlsEtc() = error("already connected")

  override fun handleSuccess() = connection

  override fun cancel() = error("unexpected cancel")

  override fun retry() = error("unexpected retry")

   *
   * We get plan0 and plan1 from the route planner.
   * We get plan2 as a follow-up to plan1, typically retry the same IP but different TLS.
   * We get plan3 as a retry of plan0, which was canceled when it lost the race.
   *
   * This test confirms that we prefer to do the TLS follow-up (plan2) before the TCP retry (plan3).
   * It also confirms we enforce the 250 ms delay in each race.
   */
  @Test

        .body("after misdirect")
        .build(),
    )

    // Seed the connection pool.
    assert200Http2Response(execute(url), server.hostName)

    // Use the coalesced connection which should retry on a fresh connection.
    val sanUrl =
      url.newBuilder()
        .host("san.com")
        .build()
    execute(sanUrl).use { response ->
      assertThat(response.code).isEqualTo(200)

      Header("max-forwards", ""),
      Header("proxy-authenticate", ""),
      Header("proxy-authorization", ""),
      Header("range", ""),
      Header("referer", ""),
      Header("refresh", ""),
      Header("retry-after", ""),
      Header("server", ""),
      Header("set-cookie", ""),
      Header("strict-transport-security", ""),
      Header("transfer-encoding", ""),
      Header("user-agent", ""),
      Header("vary", ""),