public static boolean isPowerOfTwo(int x) {
    return x > 0 & (x & (x - 1)) == 0;
  }

  /**
   * Returns 1 if {@code x < y} as unsigned integers, and 0 otherwise. Assumes that x - y fits into
   * a signed int. The implementation is branch-free, and benchmarks suggest it is measurably (if
   * narrowly) faster than the straightforward ternary expression.
   */
  @VisibleForTesting
  static int lessThanBranchFree(int x, int y) {

  }

  private static final int DISTINCT_CHARS = Character.MAX_VALUE - Character.MIN_VALUE + 1;

  /**
   * This is the actual implementation of {@link #precomputed}, but we bounce calls through a method
   * on {@link Platform} so that we can have different behavior in GWT.
   *
   * <p>This implementation tries to be smart in a number of ways. It recognizes cases where the

import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.Comparator;
import java.util.LinkedHashSet;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Set;
import javax.annotation.CheckForNull;

/**
 * An implementation of {@link ImmutableTable} holding an arbitrary number of cells.
 *
 * @author Gregory Kick
 */
@GwtCompatible
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault

  }

  private void checkHelperVersion(ClassLoader classLoader, String expectedHelperClassName)
      throws Exception {
    // Make sure we are actually running with the expected helper implementation
    Class<?> abstractFutureClass = classLoader.loadClass(AggregateFutureState.class.getName());
    Field helperField = abstractFutureClass.getDeclaredField("ATOMIC_HELPER");
    helperField.setAccessible(true);

import java.util.TreeSet;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;

/**
 * A wrapper around {@code TreeSet} that aggressively checks to see if elements are mutually
 * comparable. This implementation passes the navigable set test suites.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtIncompatible
public final class SafeTreeSet<E> implements Serializable, NavigableSet<E> {
  @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")

import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map.Entry;
import java.util.Set;
import junit.framework.TestSuite;

/**
 * Creates, based on your criteria, a JUnit test suite that exhaustively tests a {@code BiMap}
 * implementation.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtIncompatible
public class BiMapTestSuiteBuilder<K, V>
    extends PerCollectionSizeTestSuiteBuilder<

final class Platform {
  /** Returns the platform preferred implementation of a map based on a hash table. */
  static <K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object>
      Map<K, V> newHashMapWithExpectedSize(int expectedSize) {
    return CompactHashMap.createWithExpectedSize(expectedSize);
  }

  /**
   * Returns the platform preferred implementation of an insertion ordered map based on a hash
   * table.
   */

   * any {@code Entry} instances already retrieved from the entry set (this is
   * implementation-dependent). Furthermore, implementations are not required to support
   * modifications to the entry set at all, and the {@code Entry} instances themselves don't even
   * have methods for modification. See the specific implementation class for more details on how
   * its entry set handles modifications.
   *

 * should override {@code equals} as well, either providing your own implementation, or delegating
 * to the provided {@code standardEquals} method.
 *
 * <p>Each of the {@code standard} methods, where appropriate, use {@link Objects#equal} to test
 * equality for both keys and values. This may not be the desired behavior for map implementations
 * that use non-standard notions of key equality, such as the entry of a {@code SortedMap} whose

 * family. <b>Avoid</b> creating a mock or stub {@code Future}. Mock and stub implementations are
 * fragile because they assume that only certain methods will be called and because they often
 * implement subtleties of the API improperly.
 *
 * <p><b>Custom implementation</b>: Avoid implementing {@code ListenableFuture} from scratch. If you
 * can't get by with the standard implementations, prefer to derive a new {@code Future} instance