* @param timeoutDuration with timeoutUnit, the maximum length of time that callers are willing to
   *     wait on each method call to the proxy
   * @param timeoutUnit with timeoutDuration, the maximum length of time that callers are willing to
   *     wait on each method call to the proxy
   * @return a time-limiting proxy
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code interfaceType} is a regular class, enum, or

                              // WAIT #1
                              barrier.await(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS);

                              // WAIT #2
                              barrier.await(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
                              assertTrue(executor.isShutdown());
                              assertFalse(executor.isTerminated());

                              // WAIT #3

    return queryEarliestAvailable(nowMicros) - timeoutMicros <= nowMicros;
  }

  /**
   * Reserves next ticket and returns the wait time that the caller must wait for.
   *
   * @return the required wait time, never negative
   */
  final long reserveAndGetWaitLength(int permits, long nowMicros) {
    long momentAvailable = reserveEarliestAvailable(permits, nowMicros);

   */
  void awaitRunning();

  /**
   * Waits for the {@link Service} to reach the {@linkplain State#RUNNING running state} for no more
   * than the given time.
   *
   * @param timeout the maximum time to wait
   * @throws TimeoutException if the service has not reached the given state within the deadline
   * @throws IllegalStateException if the service reaches a state from which it is not possible to

    assertThat(expected)
        .hasMessageThat()
        .isEqualTo("I bet you didn't think Thread.interrupt could throw");
    // We need to wait for the runner to exit.  It used to be that the runner would get stuck in the
    // busy loop when interrupt threw.
    runner.join(TimeUnit.SECONDS.toMillis(10));
  }

    assertThat(expected)
        .hasMessageThat()
        .isEqualTo("I bet you didn't think Thread.interrupt could throw");
    // We need to wait for the runner to exit.  It used to be that the runner would get stuck in the
    // busy loop when interrupt threw.
    runner.join(TimeUnit.SECONDS.toMillis(10));
  }

      throws TimeoutException, ExecutionException {
    SettableFuture<String> future = SettableFuture.create();
    future.set(RESULT);
    /*
     * getUninterruptibly should call the timed get method once with a
     * wait of 0 seconds (and it should succeed, since the result is already
     * available).
     */
    assertEquals(RESULT, getUninterruptibly(future, 0, SECONDS));
  }

  }

  public void testJoinTimeoutMultiInterruptExpired() {
    /*
     * We don't "need" to schedule a thread completion at all here, but by doing
     * so, we come the closest we can to testing that the wait time is
     * appropriately decreased on each progressive join() call.
     */
    TimedThread thread = TimedThread.createWithDelay(LONG_DELAY_MS);
    repeatedlyInterruptTestThread(20, tearDownStack);

   * </ul>
   *
   * @throws ExecutionException if the computation threw an exception
   * @throws CancellationException if the computation was cancelled
   * @throws TimeoutException if the wait timed out
   * @since 28.0
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // java.time.Duration
  @ParametricNullness
  public static <V extends @Nullable Object> V getUninterruptibly(

    long nanosPerSecond = NANOSECONDS.convert(1, SECONDS);
    assertThat(nanosPerSecond * Long.MAX_VALUE).isLessThan(0L);

    // Check that we wait long enough anyway (presumably as long as MAX_VALUE nanos):
    TimedWaiterThread waiter = new TimedWaiterThread(future, Long.MAX_VALUE, SECONDS);
    waiter.start();
    waiter.awaitWaiting();

    future.set(1);