* name as a zero terminated ascii string "\TMP" + '\0'
         *
         * As is this works, but it deviates from the spec section 4.1.6.6 but
         * maybe I should put it in. Wonder what NT does?
         */

        return dstIndex - start;
    }


    /**
     * @param il
     * @return
     */
    private static int mapInformationLevel ( int il ) {
        switch ( il ) {

    return asImmutableList(array);
  }

  /** Views the array as an immutable list. Checks for nulls; does not copy. */
  private static <E> ImmutableList<E> construct(Object... elements) {
    return asImmutableList(checkElementsNotNull(elements));
  }

  /**
   * Views the array as an immutable list. Does not check for nulls; does not copy.
   *
   * <p>The array must be internally created.
   */

   *
   * <p>Note however that this method does not always behave identically to expressions such as:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>{@code string.toUpperCase().equals("UPPER CASE ASCII")}
   *   <li>{@code string.toLowerCase().equals("lower case ascii")}
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>due to case-folding of some non-ASCII characters (which does not occur in {@link

                int index = keys().asList().indexOf(k);
                return values().asList().get(index + 1);
              });
      fail(
          "replaceAll() should throw UnsupportedOperation if a map does "
              + "not support it and is not empty.");
    } catch (UnsupportedOperationException expected) {
    }
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  @MapFeature.Require(absent = SUPPORTS_PUT)

/**
 * An implementation of {@code Iterable} which throws an exception on all invocations of the {@link
 * #iterator()} method after the first, and whose iterator is always unmodifiable.
 *
 * <p>The {@code Iterable} specification does not make it absolutely clear what should happen on a
 * second invocation, so implementors have made various choices, including:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>returning the same iterator again
 *   <li>throwing an exception of some kind

    }
  }

  Set<K> keySet;

  @Override
  public Set<K> keySet() {
    // does not impact recency ordering
    Set<K> ks = keySet;
    return (ks != null) ? ks : (keySet = new KeySet(this));
  }

  Collection<V> values;

  @Override
  public Collection<V> values() {
    // does not impact recency ordering
    Collection<V> vs = values;

        byte[] key7 = new byte[7];
        byte[] e8 = new byte[8];

        for( int i = 0; i < key.length / 7; i++ ) {
            System.arraycopy( key, i * 7, key7, 0, 7 );
            DES des = new DES( key7 );
            des.encrypt( data, e8 );
            System.arraycopy( e8, 0, e, i * 8, 8 );
        }
    }

    static String DEFAULT_DOMAIN;
    static String DEFAULT_USERNAME;
    static String DEFAULT_PASSWORD;

 * behavior of {@link #offer} which can lead to unexpected behavior. In this case, you should
 * override {@code offer} as well.
 *
 * <p><b>{@code default} method warning:</b> This class does <i>not</i> forward calls to {@code
 * default} methods. Instead, it inherits their default implementations. When those implementations
 * invoke methods, they invoke methods on the {@code ForwardingDeque}.
 *

       * to test it.
       */
      return;
    }

    /*
     * Only under Windows (or hypothetically when running with some other non-POSIX, ACL-based
     * filesystem) does our prod code look up the username. Thus, this test doesn't necessarily test
     * anything interesting under most environments. Still, we can run it (except for Android, at

        "Incorrect function.",
        "The system cannot find the file specified.",
        "Bad password.",
        "The system cannot find the path specified.",
        "reserved",
        "The client does not have the necessary access rights to perform the requested function.",
        "Access is denied.",
        "The TID specified was invalid.",
        "The handle is invalid.",
        "The network name cannot be found.",