return new ConstantWeigher(constant);
  }

  /** Returns a {@link Weigher} that uses the integer key as the weight. */
  static Weigher<Integer, Object> intKeyWeigher() {
    return new IntKeyWeigher();
  }

  /** Returns a {@link Weigher} that uses the integer value as the weight. */
  static Weigher<Object, Integer> intValueWeigher() {
    return new IntValueWeigher();
  }

  }

  private static final class NullFriendlyComparator<T> implements Comparator<T>, Serializable {
    @Override
    public int compare(T left, T right) {
      return String.valueOf(left).compareTo(String.valueOf(right));
    }
  }

    // Test that listeners added both before and after the value is available
    // get called correctly.
    for (int i = 0; i < 20; i++) {

      // Right in the middle start up a thread to close the latch.
      if (i == 10) {
        new Thread(() -> latch.countDown()).start();
      }

      future.addListener(listenerLatch::countDown, exec);
    }

    for (int i = fromIndex, j = toIndex - 1; i < j; i++, j--) {
      byte tmp = array[i];
      array[i] = array[j];
      array[j] = tmp;
    }
  }

  /**
   * Performs a right rotation of {@code array} of "distance" places, so that the first element is
   * moved to index "distance", and the element at index {@code i} ends up at index {@code (distance

      sort(
          insertionOrder,
          new Comparator<V>() {
            @Override
            public int compare(V left, V right) {
              // The indexes are small enough for the subtraction trick to be safe.
              return indexOfEntryWithValue(left) - indexOfEntryWithValue(right);
            }

            int indexOfEntryWithValue(V value) {
              for (int i = 0; i < orderedEntries.size(); i++) {

      /*
       * If another handleException() caller created the set, we need to use that copy in case yet
       * other callers have added to it.
       *
       * This read is guaranteed to get us the right value because we only set this once (here).
       *
       * requireNonNull is safe because either our compareAndSet succeeded or it failed because
       * another thread did it for us.
       */

 * prefer the simplest interface that satisfies your use case. See the <a
 * href="https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/GraphsExplained#choosing-the-right-graph-type">
 * "Choosing the right graph type"</a> section of the Guava User Guide for more details.
 *
 * <h3>Capabilities</h3>
 *
 * <p>{@code ValueGraph} supports the following use cases (<a

      Iterable<? extends TypeToken<?>> types) {
    int i = 0;
    for (TypeToken<?> left : types) {
      int j = 0;
      for (TypeToken<?> right : types) {
        if (left.isSupertypeOf(right)) {
          assertTrue(left + " should be after " + right, i >= j);
        }
        j++;
      }
      i++;
    }
  }

      successor(pred(), succ());
      if (left == null) {
        return right;
      } else if (right == null) {
        return left;
      } else if (left.height >= right.height) {
        AvlNode<E> newTop = pred();
        // newTop is the maximum node in my left subtree
        newTop.left = left.removeMax(newTop);
        newTop.right = right;
        newTop.distinctElements = distinctElements - 1;

    return bigger;
  }

  /** Handle the case of underflow caused by needing more input characters. */
  private void readMoreChars() throws IOException {
    // Possibilities:
    // 1) array has space available on right-hand side (between limit and capacity)
    // 2) array has space available on left-hand side (before position)
    // 3) array has no space available
    //