* this is no worse than what FutureTask does in that situation. Additionally, because the
     * Future was cancelled, its listeners have been run, so its consumers will not hang.
     *
     * Contrast this to the situation we have if setResult() throws, a situation described below.
     */
    I sourceResult;
    try {
      sourceResult = getDone(localInputFuture);

   * @param terminationTimeout how long to wait for the executor to finish before terminating the
   *     JVM
   * @param timeUnit unit of time for the time parameter
   * @return an unmodifiable version of the input which will not hang the JVM
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // TODO
  @SuppressWarnings("GoodTime") // should accept a java.time.Duration
  public static ExecutorService getExitingExecutorService(

        }
      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * Call the non-timed {@link Future#get()} in a way that allows us to abort if it's expected to
   * hang forever. More precisely, if it's expected to return, we simply call it[*], but if it's
   * expected to hang (because one of the input futures that we know makes it up isn't done yet),
   * then we call it in a separate thread (using pseudoTimedGet). The result is that we wait as long

        }
      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * Call the non-timed {@link Future#get()} in a way that allows us to abort if it's expected to
   * hang forever. More precisely, if it's expected to return, we simply call it[*], but if it's
   * expected to hang (because one of the input futures that we know makes it up isn't done yet),
   * then we call it in a separate thread (using pseudoTimedGet). The result is that we wait as long

   * @param terminationTimeout how long to wait for the executor to finish before terminating the
   *     JVM
   * @return an unmodifiable version of the input which will not hang the JVM
   * @since 28.0
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // TODO
  public static ExecutorService getExitingExecutorService(
      ThreadPoolExecutor executor, Duration terminationTimeout) {

          TimeoutsToUse.FINITE,
          isBoolean(method) ? Outcome.FAILURE : Outcome.HANG);
      addTests(
          suite,
          method,
          Scenario.SATISFIED_AND_OCCUPIED_BEFORE_ENTERING,
          TimeoutsToUse.INFINITE,
          isGuarded(method) ? Outcome.HANG : (isTryEnter(method) ? Outcome.FAILURE : Outcome.HANG));
      addTests(
          suite,
          method,

          TimeoutsToUse.FINITE,
          isBoolean(method) ? Outcome.FAILURE : Outcome.HANG);
      addTests(
          suite,
          method,
          Scenario.SATISFIED_AND_OCCUPIED_BEFORE_ENTERING,
          TimeoutsToUse.INFINITE,
          isGuarded(method) ? Outcome.HANG : (isTryEnter(method) ? Outcome.FAILURE : Outcome.HANG));
      addTests(
          suite,
          method,

     * this is no worse than what FutureTask does in that situation. Additionally, because the
     * Future was cancelled, its listeners have been run, so its consumers will not hang.
     *
     * Contrast this to the situation we have if setResult() throws, a situation described below.
     */
    I sourceResult;
    try {
      sourceResult = getDone(localInputFuture);