t.Fatalf("select expects: %v, got %v", u1.ID, gotUsers[0].ID)
		} else if gotUsers[1].ID != u2.ID {
			t.Fatalf("select expects: %v, got %v", u2.ID, gotUsers[1].ID)
		}

		u1.Name = "Jinzhu"
		u2.Name = "Zhang"
		if results := DB.Save([]*user{&u1, &u2}); results.Error != nil {
			t.Fatalf("errors happened on update: %v", results.Error)
		} else if results.RowsAffected != 2 {

# Release 2.12.1

### Bug Fixes and Other Changes

          TimeoutsToUse.FINITE,
          isBoolean(method) ? Outcome.FAILURE : Outcome.HANG);
      addTests(
          suite,
          method,
          Scenario.SATISFIED_AND_OCCUPIED_BEFORE_ENTERING,
          TimeoutsToUse.INFINITE,
          isGuarded(method) ? Outcome.HANG : (isTryEnter(method) ? Outcome.FAILURE : Outcome.HANG));
      addTests(
          suite,
          method,

liệu!",requiredFields:"Bạn chưa nhập đủ các thông tin bắt buộc",badTime:"Thời gian chưa chính xác",badEmail:"Địa chỉ email chưa chính xác",badTelephone:"Số điện thoại chưa chính xác",badSecurityAnswer:"Câu hỏi bảo mật chưa chính xác",badDate:"Ngày tháng chưa chính xác",lengthBadStart:"Yêu cầu nhập từ ",lengthBadEnd:" ký tự",lengthTooLongStart:"Dữ liệu quá dài, yêu cầu ít hơn ",lengthTooShortStart:"Dữ liệu quá ngắn, yêu cầu nhiều hơn ",notConfirmed:"Dữ liệu không được xác nhận",badDomain:"Tên miền...

   * @param terminationTimeout how long to wait for the executor to finish before terminating the
   *     JVM
   * @return an unmodifiable version of the input which will not hang the JVM
   * @since 28.0 (but only since 33.4.0 in the Android flavor)
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // TODO
  public static ExecutorService getExitingExecutorService(

     * this is no worse than what FutureTask does in that situation. Additionally, because the
     * Future was cancelled, its listeners have been run, so its consumers will not hang.
     *
     * Contrast this to the situation we have if setResult() throws, a situation described below.
     */
    I sourceResult;
    try {
      sourceResult = getDone(localInputFuture);

     * this is no worse than what FutureTask does in that situation. Additionally, because the
     * Future was cancelled, its listeners have been run, so its consumers will not hang.
     *
     * Contrast this to the situation we have if setResult() throws, a situation described below.
     */
    I sourceResult;
    try {
      sourceResult = getDone(localInputFuture);

import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException;
import java.util.concurrent.Future;
import java.util.concurrent.ScheduledFuture;
import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * Tests for TestingExecutors.
 *
 * @author Eric Chang
 */
public class TestingExecutorsTest extends TestCase {
  private volatile boolean taskDone;

  public void testNoOpScheduledExecutor() throws InterruptedException {
    taskDone = false;
    Runnable task =

import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException;
import java.util.concurrent.Future;
import java.util.concurrent.ScheduledFuture;
import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * Tests for TestingExecutors.
 *
 * @author Eric Chang
 */
public class TestingExecutorsTest extends TestCase {
  private volatile boolean taskDone;

  public void testNoOpScheduledExecutor() throws InterruptedException {
    taskDone = false;
    Runnable task =

	config.Net.TLS.Config.ClientAuth = args.TLS.ClientAuth
	config.Net.TLS.Config.RootCAs = args.TLS.RootCAs

	// These settings are needed to ensure that kafka client doesn't hang on brokers
	// refer https://github.com/IBM/sarama/issues/765#issuecomment-254333355
	config.Producer.Retry.Max = 2
	config.Producer.Retry.Backoff = (1 * time.Second)
	config.Producer.Return.Successes = true