d?æ&n?v???s&enner?gåv?tivk?åm??vrejks???á&slág?tlá?vreiks??å&gåv?h?jddådåb?lf??ø&d&ob?rav??r&egark?olf??s&dav?mort????aki?i&sac?tal??u??o&b?f?g?hay?o?ttat??r!.&cer?erots?gro?m&o&c?n??rif?t??o&c,fni??pohs,stra?t&n?opsgolb,?www?ysrab,?e&a!.&a&ac?cgd?idem??bulc!orea??ci&ffartria?taborea??e&cn&a&l&lievrus-ria?ubma??netniam?rusni??erefnoc??gnahcxe?mordorea?ni&gne?lria?zagam??rawtfos??gni&d&art?ilg!arap?gnah???l&dnahdnuorg?ledom??noollab?retac?sael?t&lusnoc?uhcarap??vidyks??hcraeser?l&anruoj?euf?icnuo...

    ParameterizedType owner = (ParameterizedType) subtype.getOwnerType();
    assertEquals(Outer.class, owner.getRawType());
    // This returns a strange ? extends Sub2<Y> type, which isn't ideal.
    TypeToken<?> unused = new TypeToken<BaseWithTypeVar<List<?>>>() {}.getSubtype(Outer.Sub2.class);
  }

  public void testGetSubtype_subtypeSameAsDeclaringType() throws Exception {
    class Bar<T> {}

		{"lol", true},
		{"1-this-is-valid", true},
		{"1-this-too-is-valid-1", true},
		{"this.works.too.1", true},
		{"1234567", true},
		{"123", true},
		{"s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com", true},
		{"ideas-are-more-powerful-than-guns", true},
		{"testbucket", true},
		{"1bucket", true},
		{"bucket1", true},
		{"$this-is-not-valid-too", true},
		{"contains-$-dollar", true},
		{"contains-^-carrot", true},

    ParameterizedType owner = (ParameterizedType) subtype.getOwnerType();
    assertEquals(Outer.class, owner.getRawType());
    // This returns a strange ? extends Sub2<Y> type, which isn't ideal.
    TypeToken<?> unused = new TypeToken<BaseWithTypeVar<List<?>>>() {}.getSubtype(Outer.Sub2.class);
  }

  public void testGetSubtype_subtypeSameAsDeclaringType() throws Exception {
    class Bar<T> {}

        //
        // In the graph above we can't cluster iteration++ with any of the
        // gradient update operations since that will break the TF resource
        // variable memory model.  Given that constraint the ideal clustering
        // would be to put all the gradient updates and all of the Computation_*
        // nodes in one cluster, and leave iteration++ and NoOp unclustered.
        //