{"or", "{{or 0 0}} {{or 1 0}} {{or 0 true}} {{or 1 1}}", "0 1 true 1", nil, true},
	{"or short-circuit", "{{or 0 1 (die)}}", "1", nil, true},
	{"and short-circuit", "{{and 1 0 (die)}}", "0", nil, true},
	{"or short-circuit2", "{{or 0 0 (die)}}", "", nil, false},
	{"and short-circuit2", "{{and 1 1 (die)}}", "", nil, false},
	{"and pipe-true", "{{1 | and 1}}", "1", nil, true},
	{"and pipe-false", "{{0 | and 1}}", "0", nil, true},

	// Does it recognize itself?
	b1 := NewReaderSize(b, BufSize)
	if b1 != b {
		t.Error("NewReaderSize did not detect underlying Reader")
	}
	// Does it wrap if existing buffer is too small?
	b2 := NewReaderSize(b, 2*BufSize)
	if b2 == b {
		t.Error("NewReaderSize did not enlarge buffer")
	}
}

func TestNewWriterSizeIdempotent(t *testing.T) {
	const BufSize = 1000

    are called instead of `requestBodyEnd()` and `responseBodyEnd()` in some failure situations.
    They may also be fired in cases where no event was published previously. In this release we did
    an internal rewrite of our event code to fix problems where events were lost or unbalanced.

 *  Fix: Don't leak a connection when a call is canceled immediately preceding the `onFailure()`
    callback.

  Log-Output "Wrote fluentd logging config to $fluentd_config_file"

  # Configure StackdriverLogging to automatically restart on failure after 10
  # seconds. The logging agent may die die to various disruptions but can be
  # resumed.
  sc.exe failure StackdriverLogging reset= 0 actions= restart/1000/restart/10000
  Write-VerboseServiceInfoToConsole -Service 'StackdriverLogging'
}

	if !ok {
		return
	}
	if status.terminatingAt.IsZero() {
		klog.V(4).InfoS("Pod worker is complete but did not have terminatingAt set, likely programmer error", "podUID", podUID)
	}
	if status.terminatedAt.IsZero() {
		klog.V(4).InfoS("Pod worker is complete but did not have terminatedAt set, likely programmer error", "podUID", podUID)
	}
	status.finished = true
	status.working = false

				Error: simulation.ErrProtocolError,
			},
			Permissive: simulation.Result{
				// This could also be a protocol error. In the current implementation, we choose not
				// to create a match since if we did it would just be rejected in HCM; no match
				// is more performant
				Error: simulation.ErrNoFilterChain,
			},
			Strict: simulation.Result{
				// TLS, but not mTLS
				Error: simulation.ErrMTLSError,
			},

			if b.Func.Config.arch != "386" && b.Func.Config.arch != "amd64" {
				break
			}
			divr := v.Args[1]
			divrLim, divrLimok := ft.limits[divr.ID]
			divd := v.Args[0]
			divdLim, divdLimok := ft.limits[divd.ID]
			if (divrLimok && (divrLim.max < -1 || divrLim.min > -1)) ||
				(divdLimok && divdLim.min > mostNegativeDividend[v.Op]) {
				// See DivisionNeedsFixUp in rewrite.go.

	// during module resolution and the error will not be suppressed.
	SilenceNoGoErrors bool

	// SilenceUnmatchedWarnings suppresses the warnings normally emitted for
	// patterns that did not match any packages.
	SilenceUnmatchedWarnings bool

	// Resolve the query against this module.
	MainModule module.Version

	// If Switcher is non-nil, then LoadPackages passes all encountered errors

==== Nullable annotations better reflect actual nullability of API

In some APIs, nullability was not correctly annotated and APIs that did allow null or returned null were marked as non-null.
In Java or Groovy, this mismatch did not cause problems at compile time.
In Kotlin, this mismatch made valid code difficult to write because the language would not allow you to pass null.

                        newSessId = response.getSessionId();

                        if ( newSessId != curSessId ) {
                            throw new SmbAuthException("Server did not reauthenticate after expiration");
                        }
                    }
                    catch ( SmbAuthException sae ) {
                        throw sae;
                    }