* the other.
   *
   * <p>The resulting multimap's views have iterators that don't support {@code remove()}, but all
   * other methods are supported by the multimap and its views. When adding a key that doesn't
   * satisfy the predicate, the multimap's {@code put()}, {@code putAll()}, and {@code
   * replaceValues()} methods throw an {@link IllegalArgumentException}.
   *

Hence it can discover all sub-properties declared by a runtime sub-type.

When adding `@link:{javadocPath}/org/gradle/api/tasks/Nested.html[Nested]` to a `link:{javadocPath}/org/gradle/api/provider/Provider.html[Provider]`, the value of the `Provider` is treated as a nested input.

When adding `@link:{javadocPath}/org/gradle/api/tasks/Nested.html[Nested]` to an iterable, each element is treated as a separate nested input.

    }

    def "throws NullPointerException when adding an entry with a null key to the property"() {
        when:
        property.put(null, (String) 'v')
        then:
        def ex = thrown NullPointerException
        ex.message == "Cannot add an entry with a null key to a property of type ${type().simpleName}."
    }

    def "throws NullPointerException when adding an entry with a null value to the property"() {

		nodes                []*v1.Node
		expectedAntiAffinity topologyToMatchedTermCount
		expectedAffinity     topologyToMatchedTermCount
	}{
		{
			name: "preFilterState anti-affinity terms are updated correctly after adding and removing a pod",
			pendingPod: &v1.Pod{
				ObjectMeta: metav1.ObjectMeta{Name: "pending", Labels: selector1},
				Spec: v1.PodSpec{
					Affinity: &v1.Affinity{
						PodAntiAffinity: antiAffinityFooBar,

        then:
        def e = thrown(IllegalStateException)
        e.message == "Cannot query the value of ${displayName} because it has no value available."
    }

    def "property has no value when adding an element provider with no value"() {
        given:
        property.set(toMutable(["123"]))
        property.add("456")
        property.add(notDefined())

        expect:
        !property.present

    }
    assertWithMessage("table size after adding " + size + " elements")
        .that(bucketsOf(map1))
        .isEqualTo(initialBuckets);

    /*
     * Something slightly different happens when the entries are added all at
     * once; make sure that passes too.
     */
    map2.putAll(map1);
    assertWithMessage("table size after adding " + size + " elements")
        .that(bucketsOf(map1))

}

class CanFuseConvOrDepthwiseConv<string is_depthwise> : Constraint<
  CPred<"TFL::CanFuseConvOrDepthwiseConv($0, $1, " # is_depthwise # ")">>;

// If we see a binary op (add, sub) op adding a constant value to a convolution
// op with constant bias, we can fuse the binary op into the convolution op by
// constant folding the bias and the binary op's constant operand. The following

			},
			DeletionTimestamp: &deletedTs,
		},
		AddressType: discovery.AddressTypeIPv4,
	}
	err = esController.endpointSliceStore.Add(endpointSlice)
	if err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("Expected no error adding EndpointSlice: %v", err)
	}
	_, err = client.DiscoveryV1().EndpointSlices(ns).Create(context.TODO(), endpointSlice, metav1.CreateOptions{})
	if err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("Expected no error creating EndpointSlice: %v", err)

                    withModule('org:directA', ModifyDependencyRule) {
                        params(CUSTOM_ATTRIBUTE)
                    }
                    // 2d notation: adding dependencies (this is a different code path)
                    withModule('org:directB', AddDependencyRule) {
                        params(CUSTOM_ATTRIBUTE)
                    }
                }

  // safely publish these objects and we won't need this whole discussion.
  // TODO(user,lukes): consider adding volatile to all these fields since in current known JVMs
  // that should resolve the issue. This comes at the cost of adding more write barriers to the
  // implementations.

  private Futures() {}

  /**