checkNonnegative(expectedSize, "expectedSize");
    return new Builder<>(expectedSize);
  }

  static void checkNoConflict(
      boolean safe, String conflictDescription, Object entry1, Object entry2) {
    if (!safe) {
      throw conflictException(conflictDescription, entry1, entry2);
    }
  }

  static IllegalArgumentException conflictException(

          submittingTaskQueue.nextTask = task;
          // requireNonNull(delegate) is safe for reasons similar to requireNonNull(sequencer).
          submittingTaskQueue.nextExecutor = requireNonNull(delegate);
          delegate = null;
        } else {
          // requireNonNull(delegate) is safe for reasons similar to requireNonNull(sequencer).
          Executor localDelegate = requireNonNull(delegate);

 * useForNull} has no effect on the instance it is invoked on! You must store and use the new joiner
 * instance returned by the method. This makes joiners thread-safe, and safe to store as {@code
 * static final} constants.
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * // Bad! Do not do this!
 * Joiner joiner = Joiner.on(',');
 * joiner.skipNulls(); // does nothing!
 * return joiner.join("wrong", null, "wrong");

   *
   * <p>Note, however, that although multiple locks can be created for a given Enum value, whether
   * it be through separate factory instances or through multiple calls to the same factory,
   * attempting to acquire multiple locks with the same Enum value (within the same thread) will
   * result in an IllegalStateException regardless of the factory's policy. For example:
   *
   * <pre>{@code

                    sqlalchemy_safe=sqlalchemy_safe,
                )
                encoded_value = jsonable_encoder(
                    value,
                    by_alias=by_alias,
                    exclude_unset=exclude_unset,
                    exclude_none=exclude_none,
                    custom_encoder=custom_encoder,
                    sqlalchemy_safe=sqlalchemy_safe,
                )

        return new IllegalArgumentException(
            "Multiple entries with same key: " + key + "=" + value1 + " and " + key + "=" + value2);
      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * Returns an immutable map containing the same entries as {@code map}. The returned map iterates
   * over entries in the same order as the {@code entrySet} of the original map. If {@code map}

 * Ordering#leastOf(Iterable, int)}, which provides the same implementation with an interface
 * tailored to that use case.
 *
 * <p>This uses the same efficient implementation as {@link Ordering#leastOf(Iterable, int)},
 * offering expected O(n + k log k) performance (worst case O(n log k)) for n calls to {@link
 * #offer} and a call to {@link #topK}, with O(k) memory. In comparison, quickselect has the same

    @CheckForNull Node<K, V> previous; // the previous node (with any key)
    @CheckForNull Node<K, V> nextSibling; // the next node with the same key
    @CheckForNull Node<K, V> previousSibling; // the previous node with the same key

    Node(@ParametricNullness K key, @ParametricNullness V value) {
      this.key = key;
      this.value = value;
    }

    @Override

    return results
```

---

Se sua aplicação (de alguma forma) não tem que se comunicar com nada mais e tem que esperar que o respondam, use `async def`.

---

Se você simplesmente não sabe, use apenas `def`.

---

                                + "plugin(s) that have goals not marked as thread-safe to support parallel execution.",
                        "While this /may/ work fine, please look for plugin updates and/or "
                                + "request plugins be made thread-safe.",
                        "If reporting an issue, report it against the plugin in question, not against Apache Maven.")) {