for (int i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
          array[i] = counter.getAndIncrement();
        }
        builder.addAll(ImmutableIntArray.copyOf(array));
      }
    },
    ADD_LARGER_ARRAY {
      @Override
      void doIt(ImmutableIntArray.Builder builder, AtomicInteger counter) {
        int[] array = new int[RANDOM.nextInt(200) + 200];
        for (int i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {

   * Returns an immutable array containing the same values as {@code this} array. This is logically
   * a no-op, and in some circumstances {@code this} itself is returned. However, if this instance
   * is a {@link #subArray} view of a larger array, this method will copy only the appropriate range
   * of values, resulting in an equivalent array with a smaller memory footprint.
   */
  public ImmutableLongArray trimmed() {

     * including in MapRetrievalCache, so I'm not sure why this one is different. I did at least
     * confirm that my change to MapIteratorCache fixes the TSAN error in the (larger) test it was
     * originally reported in.
     */
    for (Future<?> future : futures.build()) {
      future.get();
    }
    executor.shutdown();
  }

     * including in MapRetrievalCache, so I'm not sure why this one is different. I did at least
     * confirm that my change to MapIteratorCache fixes the TSAN error in the (larger) test it was
     * originally reported in.
     */
    for (Future<?> future : futures.build()) {
      future.get();
    }
    executor.shutdown();
  }

 *
 * <p>Unlike {@code java.util.HashMap}, iteration is only proportional to the actual {@code size()},
 * which is optimal, and <i>not</i> the size of the internal hashtable, which could be much larger
 * than {@code size()}. Furthermore, this structure places significantly reduced load on the garbage
 * collector by only using a constant number of internal objects.
 *

   *     length of zero or cannot be parsed as a long value
   * @throws NullPointerException if {@code string} is {@code null}
   * @since 14.0
   */
  @CheckForNull
  public static Long tryParse(String string) {
    return tryParse(string, 10);
  }

  /**
   * Parses the specified string as a signed long value using the specified radix. The ASCII

        .suppressing(parentBuilder.getSuppressedTests())
        .createTestSuite();
  }

  /**
   * To avoid infinite recursion, test suites with these marker features won't have derived suites
   * created for them.
   */
  enum NoRecurse implements Feature<Void> {
    SUBMULTISET,
    DESCENDING;

    @Override

        .suppressing(parentBuilder.getSuppressedTests())
        .createTestSuite();
  }

  /**
   * To avoid infinite recursion, test suites with these marker features won't have derived suites
   * created for them.
   */
  enum NoRecurse implements Feature<Void> {
    SUBMULTISET,
    DESCENDING;

    @Override

   *
   * <p><b>Java 8+ users:</b> use {@link Long#parseUnsignedLong(String, int)} instead.
   *
   * @param string the string containing the unsigned {@code long} representation to be parsed.
   * @param radix the radix to use while parsing {@code string}
   * @throws NumberFormatException if the string does not contain a valid unsigned {@code long} with

 *
 * <p>Unlike {@code java.util.HashSet}, iteration is only proportional to the actual {@code size()},
 * which is optimal, and <i>not</i> the size of the internal hashtable, which could be much larger
 * than {@code size()}. Furthermore, this structure only depends on a fixed number of arrays; {@code
 * add(x)} operations <i>do not</i> create objects for the garbage collector to deal with, and for