fail();
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException expected) {
    }
  }

  /**
   * If there's a bug in builder growth, we wouldn't know how to expose it. So, brute force the hell
   * out of it for a while and see what happens.
   */
  public void testBuilder_bruteForce() {
    for (int i = 0; i < reduceIterationsIfGwt(100); i++) {

      fail();
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException expected) {
    }
  }

  /**
   * If there's a bug in builder growth, we wouldn't know how to expose it. So, brute force the hell
   * out of it for a while and see what happens.
   */
  public void testBuilder_bruteForce() {
    for (int i = 0; i < reduceIterationsIfGwt(100); i++) {

import javax.annotation.CheckForNull;

/**
 * An immutable array of {@code int} values, with an API resembling {@link List}.
 *
 * <p>Advantages compared to {@code int[]}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>All the many well-known advantages of immutability (read <i>Effective Java</i>, third
 *       edition, Item 17).
 *   <li>Has the value-based (not identity-based) {@link #equals}, {@link #hashCode}, and {@link
 *       #toString} behavior you expect

         * the type parameter is <E>, since otherwise the
         * MultiExceptionListIterator wouldn't be an Iterator<E>. The cast is
         * safe, even though javac can't tell.
         *
         * Sun bug 6665356 is an additional complication. Until OpenJDK 7, javac
         * doesn't recognize this kind of cast as unchecked cast. Neither does

import javax.annotation.CheckForNull;

/**
 * An immutable array of {@code double} values, with an API resembling {@link List}.
 *
 * <p>Advantages compared to {@code double[]}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>All the many well-known advantages of immutability (read <i>Effective Java</i>, third
 *       edition, Item 17).
 *   <li>Has the value-based (not identity-based) {@link #equals}, {@link #hashCode}, and {@link
 *       #toString} behavior you expect.

  }

  /**
   * Tests for Predicates.instanceOf(x). TODO: Fix the comment style after fixing annotation
   * stripper to remove comments properly. Currently, all tests before the comments are removed as
   * well.
   */
  @GwtIncompatible // Predicates.instanceOf
  public void testIsInstanceOf_apply() {
    Predicate<@Nullable Object> isInteger = Predicates.instanceOf(Integer.class);

    assertTrue(isInteger.apply(1));

import junit.framework.AssertionFailedError;
import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * Base class for JSR166 Junit TCK tests. Defines some constants, utility methods and classes, as
 * well as a simple framework for helping to make sure that assertions failing in generated threads
 * cause the associated test that generated them to itself fail (which JUnit does not otherwise

      }
    }
  }

  /*
   * This next part consists of several sample classes that provide
   * demonstrations of conditions that cause NullPointerTester
   * to succeed/fail.
   */

  /** Lots of well-behaved methods. */
  @SuppressWarnings("unused") // used by reflection
  private static class PassObject extends SomeClassThatDoesNotUseNullable {
    public static void doThrow(Object arg) {
      if (arg == null) {

  //    confusing. It's nice for the finally block to look as close as
  //    possible to the thing right before the try. You could have
  //    guard.leave(), but that's a little odd as well because the
  //    guard doesn't have anything to do with leaving. You can't
  //    really enforce that the guard you're leaving is the same one
  //    you entered with, and it doesn't actually matter.
  //

    boolean collide = false; // True if last slot nonempty
    for (; ; ) {
      Cell[] as;
      Cell a;
      int n;
      long v;
      if ((as = cells) != null && (n = as.length) > 0) {
        if ((a = as[(n - 1) & h]) == null) {
          if (busy == 0) { // Try to attach new Cell
            Cell r = new Cell(x); // Optimistically create
            if (busy == 0 && casBusy()) {