this.equivalence = checkNotNull(equivalence);
    this.relationshipName = checkNotNull(relationshipName);
    this.hashName = checkNotNull(hashName);
    this.itemReporter = checkNotNull(itemReporter);
  }

  // TODO(cpovirk): should we reject null items, since the tests already check null automatically?
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public RelationshipTester<T> addRelatedGroup(Iterable<? extends T> group) {
    groups.add(ImmutableList.copyOf(group));

   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify/issues/65
   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jdk/commit/71d826792b8c7ef95d492c50a274deab938f2552
   */
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): Is the unchecked cast avoidable? Would System.arraycopy be similarly fast (if
   * likewise not type-checked)? Could our single caller do something different?
   */
  @SuppressWarnings({"nullness", "unchecked"})

    assertEquals(2, ictim.size());

    assertEquals(0, (int) ictim.getInstance(Integer.class));
    assertEquals(1, (int) ictim.getInstance(int.class));
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("rawtypes") // TODO(cpovirk): Can we at least use Class<?> in some places?
  abstract static class TestClassToInstanceMapGenerator implements TestMapGenerator<Class, Impl> {

    @Override
    public Class<?>[] createKeyArray(int length) {

     * always contains not just the current thread's exception but also the initial thread's.
     */
    Set<Throwable> seenExceptionsLocal = seenExceptions;
    if (seenExceptionsLocal == null) {
      // TODO(cpovirk): Should we use a simpler (presumably cheaper) data structure?
      /*
       * Using weak references here could let us release exceptions earlier, but:
       *

            /*
             * StandardDescendingMap uses lowerEntry(), and TreeMap.lowerEntry() deliberately
             * produces immutable entries.
             *
             * TODO(cpovirk): Consider making StandardDescendingMap return a ForwardingEntry that
             * supports setValue().
             */
            .suppressing(
                MapEntrySetTester.getSetValueMethod(),

  }

  private <T> TypeToken<Iterable<T>> anyIterableType() {
    return new TypeToken<Iterable<T>>() {};
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("rawtypes") // TODO(cpovirk): Can we at least use Class<?> in some places?
  abstract static class TestTypeToInstanceMapGenerator
      implements TestMapGenerator<TypeToken, Object> {

    @Override

   * characters).
   *
   * @param c the character to escape
   * @return the replacement characters, or {@code null} if no escaping was required
   */
  // TODO(dbeaumont,cpovirk): Rename this something better once refactoring done
  @CheckForNull
  protected abstract char[] escapeUnsafe(char c);

 * implementations are in {@link AbstractNetwork}; in future they might be in {@link Network}
 * itself, once we are willing to use Java 8 default methods.
 */
@AndroidIncompatible
// TODO(cpovirk): Figure out Android JUnit 4 support. Does it work with Gingerbread? @RunWith?
@RunWith(Parameterized.class)
public final class DefaultNetworkImplementationsTest {
  private MutableNetwork<Integer, String> network;

 * implementations are in {@link AbstractNetwork}; in future they might be in {@link Network}
 * itself, once we are willing to use Java 8 default methods.
 */
@AndroidIncompatible
// TODO(cpovirk): Figure out Android JUnit 4 support. Does it work with Gingerbread? @RunWith?
@RunWith(Parameterized.class)
public final class DefaultNetworkImplementationsTest {
  private MutableNetwork<Integer, String> network;

    assertEquals(2, ictim.size());

    assertEquals(0, (int) ictim.getInstance(Integer.class));
    assertEquals(1, (int) ictim.getInstance(int.class));
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("rawtypes") // TODO(cpovirk): Can we at least use Class<?> in some places?
  abstract static class TestClassToInstanceMapGenerator implements TestMapGenerator<Class, Impl> {

    @Override
    public Class<?>[] createKeyArray(int length) {