*/

.screenshot {
  display: block;
  background-color: #d3e0de;
  border-radius: 4px;
  padding: 45px 5px 5px;
  position: relative;
  -webkit-box-sizing: border-box;
          box-sizing: border-box;
}

.screenshot img {
  display: block;
  border-radius: 2px;
}

.screenshot:before {
  content: '';
  position: absolute;
  top: 15px;
  left: 15px;

    // we try hard to make them robust in practice.  We could additionally try to add in a system
    // load timeout multiplier.  Or we could try to use a CPU time bound instead of wall clock time
    // bound.  But these ideas are harder to implement.  We do not try to detect or handle a
    // user-specified -XX:+DisableExplicitGC.
    //
    // TODO(user): Consider using
    // java/lang/management/OperatingSystemMXBean.html#getSystemLoadAverage()

  @CollectionFeature.Require({SUPPORTS_ITERATOR_REMOVE, KNOWN_ORDER})
  public void testRemovingIteratorKnownOrder() {
    new IteratorTester<E>(
        4,
        MODIFIABLE,
        getSubjectGenerator().order(Arrays.asList(e0(), e1(), e1(), e2())),
        IteratorTester.KnownOrder.KNOWN_ORDER) {
      @Override
      protected Iterator<E> newTargetIterator() {

    }

    public void setOrder_Equal(Integer order) {
        setOrder_Term(order, null);
    }

    public void setOrder_Equal(Integer order, ConditionOptionCall<TermQueryBuilder> opLambda) {
        setOrder_Term(order, opLambda);
    }

    public void setOrder_Term(Integer order) {
        setOrder_Term(order, null);
    }

    public void setOrder_Term(Integer order, ConditionOptionCall<TermQueryBuilder> opLambda) {

        this.docId = value;
    }

    public Integer getOrder() {
        checkSpecifiedProperty("order");
        return order;
    }

    public void setOrder(Integer value) {
        registerModifiedProperty("order");
        this.order = value;
    }

    public String getQueryId() {
        checkSpecifiedProperty("queryId");
        return convertEmptyToNull(queryId);

      for (Integer j : IN_ORDER_VALUES) {
        assertFalse(range.contains(j));
      }
    }
  }

  public void testCreateEmptyRangeOpenClosedSucceeds() {
    for (Integer i : IN_ORDER_VALUES) {
      GeneralRange<@Nullable Integer> range = GeneralRange.range(ORDERING, i, OPEN, i, CLOSED);
      for (Integer j : IN_ORDER_VALUES) {
        assertFalse(range.contains(j));
      }
    }
  }

  private static final Feature<?>[] COLLECTION_FEATURES_ORDER = {
    CollectionSize.ANY, CollectionFeature.KNOWN_ORDER, CollectionFeature.ALLOWS_NULL_QUERIES
  };

  private static final Feature<?>[] COLLECTION_FEATURES_REMOVE = {
    CollectionSize.ANY, CollectionFeature.SUPPORTS_REMOVE, CollectionFeature.ALLOWS_NULL_QUERIES
  };

  private static final Feature<?>[] COLLECTION_FEATURES_REMOVE_ORDER = {
    CollectionSize.ANY,

      }

      @Override
      public List<String> order(List<String> insertionOrder) {
        List<String> order = Lists.newArrayList();
        for (String s : insertionOrder) {
          int index = order.indexOf(s);
          if (index == -1) {
            order.add(s);
          } else {
            order.add(index, s);
          }
        }
        return order;
      }
    };
  }

  public void testCreate() {

    // we try hard to make them robust in practice.  We could additionally try to add in a system
    // load timeout multiplier.  Or we could try to use a CPU time bound instead of wall clock time
    // bound.  But these ideas are harder to implement.  We do not try to detect or handle a
    // user-specified -XX:+DisableExplicitGC.
    //
    // TODO(user): Consider using
    // java/lang/management/OperatingSystemMXBean.html#getSystemLoadAverage()

    return new Integer[length];
  }

  /**
   * {@inheritDoc}
   *
   * <p>By default, returns the supplied elements in their given order; however, generators for
   * containers with a known order other than insertion order must override this method.
   *
   * <p>Note: This default implementation is overkill (but valid) for an unordered container. An