<version>1.0</version>
  <name>Guava ListenableFuture only</name>
  <description>
    Contains Guava's com.google.common.util.concurrent.ListenableFuture class,
    without any of its other classes -- but is also available in a second
    "version" that omits the class to avoid conflicts with the copy in Guava
    itself. The idea is:

    - If users want only ListenableFuture, they depend on listenablefuture-1.0.

  <groupId>org.apache.maven.its.mng1412</groupId>
  <artifactId>test</artifactId>
  <version>0.1-SNAPSHOT</version>

  <name>Maven Integration Test :: MNG-1412</name>
  <description>
    Check that dependencies are available in classpath in same order as declared in POM.
  </description>

  <dependencies>
    <!-- model dependencies first, in the order given -->
    <dependency>
      <groupId>org.apache.maven.its.mng1412</groupId>

            </signature>
            <ignores>
              <!-- Unsafe isn't part of the documented Android API, but it is available.
                   And in cases where it's not, we have fallbacks (except maybe Striped64 (b/307807965)?). -->
              <ignore>sun.misc.Unsafe</ignore>
            </ignores>
          </configuration>

              <name>spec</name>
              <placement>X</placement>
            </tag>
          </tags>

          <!-- TODO(cpovirk): Move this to the parent after making the package-list files available there. -->
          <!-- We add the link ourselves, both so that we can choose Java 9 over the version that -source suggests and so that we can solve the JSR305 problem described below. -->

  <name>Guava ListenableFuture only</name>
  <description>
    An empty artifact that Guava depends on to signal that it is providing
    ListenableFuture -- but is also available in a second "version" that
    contains com.google.common.util.concurrent.ListenableFuture class, without
    any other Guava classes. The idea is:

    - If users want only ListenableFuture, they depend on listenablefuture-1.0.

              <name>spec</name>
              <placement>X</placement>
            </tag>
          </tags>

          <!-- TODO(cpovirk): Move this to the parent after making the package-list files available there. -->
          <!-- We add the link ourselves, both so that we can choose Java 9 over the version that -source suggests and so that we can solve the JSR305 problem described below. -->