h, err := rs.ToHeader()
		if err != nil && !testCase.errExpected || err == nil && testCase.errExpected {
			t.Errorf("expected error with invalid range: %v", err)
		}
		if h != testCase.spec {
			t.Errorf("Case %d: translated to incorrect header: %s expected: %s",
				i, h, testCase.spec)
		}
	}

whereas in MinIO erasure code you can lose as many as half of drives and still the data remains safe. Further, MinIO's erasure code is at the object level and can heal one object at a time. For RAID, healing can be done only at the volume level which translates into high downtime. As MinIO encodes each object individually, it can heal objects incrementally. Storage servers once deployed should not require drive replacement or healing for the lifetime of the server. MinIO's erasure coded backend is designed...

package cmd

import (
	"bufio"
	"bytes"
	"fmt"
	"io"
	"net/http"
	"strings"
)

// newUnsignedV4ChunkedReader returns a new s3UnsignedChunkedReader that translates the data read from r
// out of HTTP "chunked" format before returning it.
// The s3ChunkedReader returns io.EOF when the final 0-length chunk is read.