Here's a little bit of that history.

## Alternatives

I have been creating APIs with complex requirements for several years (Machine Learning, distributed systems, asynchronous jobs, NoSQL databases, etc), leading several teams of developers.

As part of that, I needed to investigate, test and use many alternatives.

The history of **FastAPI** is in great part the history of its predecessors.

      }
      copy(resourceUrl, file);
    }

    return file;
  }

  /**
   * Creates a new temp dir for testing. The returned directory and all contents of it will be
   * deleted in the tear-down for this test.
   */
  protected final File createTempDir() throws IOException {
    File tempFile = File.createTempFile("IoTestCase", "");
    if (!tempFile.delete() || !tempFile.mkdir()) {

		return nil, oErr
	}
	return queueStore, nil
}

// Tear down queue store.
func tearDownQueueStore() error {
	return os.RemoveAll(queueDir)
}

// TestQueueStorePut - tests for store.Put
func TestQueueStorePut(t *testing.T) {
	defer func() {
		if err := tearDownQueueStore(); err != nil {
			t.Fatal("Failed to tear down store ", err)
		}
	}()
	store, err := setUpQueueStore(queueDir, 100)

		return nil, errNotImplemented
	}
	return FromTimestamp(t.Add(duration)), nil
}

// dateDiff computes the difference between two times in terms of the
// `timePart` which can be years, months, days, hours, minutes or
// seconds. For difference in years, months or days, the time part,
// including timezone is ignored.
func dateDiff(timePart string, ts1, ts2 time.Time) (*Value, error) {
	if ts2.Before(ts1) {

* To explain *rejected solutions*, for now and future development, in case they are proposed again.

ADRs can be written by any team.
Like code, they should be reviewed by any other relevant teams.
The goal is not to *own* a decision, but to *share* it with other teams, and improve the build tool together.

### Format

The format for ADR should follow this template:

```markdown
# ADR-000X - Title

## Date

20YY-MM-DD

* To explain *rejected solutions*, for now, and future development, in case they are proposed again.

ADRs can be written by any team.
Like code, they should be reviewed by any other relevant teams.
The goal is not to *own* a decision, but to *share* it with other teams, and improve the build tool together.

### Format

The format for ADR should follow this template:

```markdown
# ADR-000X - Title

## Date

20YY-MM-DD

> directory are stable and appropriate documentation around its usage is in
> place.

Maintainer: TensorFlow DevInfra

Issue Reporting: File an issue against this repo and tag
[@devinfra](https://github.com/orgs/tensorflow/teams/devinfra)

********************************************************************************

A directory for build and CI related scripts and jobs managed by the TensorFlow

apps may target different 'environments' which contain different instances and variants of Istio.

- Better security: separate Istio components reside in different namespaces, allowing different teams or
roles to manage different parts of Istio. For example, a security team would maintain the
root CA and policy, a telemetry team may only have access to Prometheus,

 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 * @since 10.0
 */
@FunctionalInterface
@GwtCompatible
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
public interface TearDown {
  /**
   * Performs a <b>single</b> tear-down operation. See test-libraries-for-java's {@code
   * com.google.common.testing.junit3.TearDownTestCase} and {@code
   * com.google.common.testing.junit4.TearDownTestCase} for example.
   *

      }
      copy(resourceUrl, file);
    }

    return file;
  }

  /**
   * Creates a new temp dir for testing. The returned directory and all contents of it will be
   * deleted in the tear-down for this test.
   */
  protected final File createTempDir() throws IOException {
    File tempFile = File.createTempFile("IoTestCase", "");
    if (!tempFile.delete() || !tempFile.mkdir()) {