self.security_scopes = security_scopes
        self.security_scopes_param_name = security_scopes_param_name
        self.name = name
        self.call = call
        self.use_cache = use_cache
        # Store the path to be able to re-generate a dependable from it in overrides
        self.path = path
        # Save the cache key at creation to optimize performance

* Make sure you have well defined Pydantic models for your request bodies and responses.
* Configure any required permissions and roles using dependencies.
* Never store plaintext passwords, only password hashes.
* Implement and use well-known cryptographic tools, like Passlib and JWT tokens, etc.
* Add more granular permission controls with OAuth2 scopes where needed.
* ...etc.

        run: bash scripts/test.sh
        env:
          COVERAGE_FILE: coverage/.coverage.${{ runner.os }}-py${{ matrix.python-version }}
          CONTEXT: ${{ runner.os }}-py${{ matrix.python-version }}
      - name: Store coverage files
        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3
        with:
          name: coverage
          path: coverage

  coverage-combine:
    needs: [test]
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:

.coverage
coverage.xml
.netlify
test.db
log.txt
Pipfile.lock
env3.*
env
docs_build
site_build
venv
docs.zip
archive.zip

# vim temporary files
*~
.*.sw?
.cache

# macOS

Doing that in separated functions that don't share logic or variables together is more difficult as you would need to store values in global variables or similar tricks.

Because of that, it's now recommended to instead use the `lifespan` as explained above.

## Technical Details

Just a technical detail for the curious nerds. 🤓

### Project file structure

Let's say your project file structure looks like this:

```
.
├── app
│   ├── __init__.py
│   ├── main.py
```

Now create a directory to store those static files.

Your new file structure could look like this:

```
.
├── app
│   ├── __init__.py
│   ├── main.py
└── static/
```

### Download the files

But if we use the same model for another *path operation*, we could be sending our user's passwords to every client.

!!! danger
    Never store the plain password of a user or send it in a response like this, unless you know all the caveats and you know what you are doing.

## Add an output model

It's relatively tightly coupled with relational databases (like MySQL or PostgreSQL), so, having a NoSQL database (like Couchbase, MongoDB, Cassandra, etc) as the main store engine is not very easy.

### About `request.state`

    return items[item_id]


@app.patch("/items/{item_id}", response_model=Item)
async def update_item(item_id: str, item: Item):
    stored_item_data = items[item_id]
    stored_item_model = Item(**stored_item_data)
    update_data = item.dict(exclude_unset=True)
    updated_item = stored_item_model.copy(update=update_data)
    items[item_id] = jsonable_encoder(updated_item)