}

    @Override
    public E aboveSamplesGreater() {
      throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
    }
  }

  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): surely we can find a less ugly solution than a class that accepts 3 parameters,
   * exposes as many getters, does work in the constructor, and has both a superclass and a subclass
   */
  public static class SortedMapSubmapTestMapGenerator<

    return least(k, comparator.reversed());
  }

  /**
   * Returns the minimum of the two values. If the values compare as 0, the first is returned.
   *
   * <p>The recommended solution for finding the {@code minimum} of some values depends on the type
   * of your data and the number of elements you have. Read more in the Guava User Guide article on

    // when deep chains of futures exist resulting in a StackOverflowException. We could detect
    // arbitrary cycles using a thread local but this should be a good enough solution (it is also
    // what jdk collections do in these cases)
    try {
      if (o == this) {
        builder.append("this future");
      } else {
        builder.append(o);
      }

 * cannot override this binding. This is because the lookup is always short-circuited in this
 * specific situation (plain @Inject request, and plain explicit binding for the same type.)
 *
 * The simplest solution is to use a custom @Named here so it isn't bound under the plain key.
 * This is only necessary for default components using @Typed that want to support overriding.
 *

    }

    @Override
    public E aboveSamplesGreater() {
      throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
    }
  }

  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): surely we can find a less ugly solution than a class that accepts 3 parameters,
   * exposes as many getters, does work in the constructor, and has both a superclass and a subclass
   */
  public static class SortedMapSubmapTestMapGenerator<