* lifecycle at all, in which case we wouldn't be needing this class at all ( and
 * ProjectBuildList.getByTaskSegments). Or maybe they should be introduced in the calculation
 * of the execution plan instead, which seems much nicer.
 * </p>
 * <p>
 * Additionally this class contains a clone of the MavenSession, which is *only* needed
 * because it has as notion of a "current" project.
 * </p>

    // org.apache.maven:maven-plugin-api
    // In this case, both the verify and the report goals are called
    // in a different lifecycle. Though the compiler-plugin has a valid use case, although
    // that seems to work fine. We need to take versions and lifecycle into account.
    public ProjectSorter(Collection<MavenProject> projects) throws CycleDetectedException, DuplicateProjectException {
        graph = new Graph();

                        }
                    }
                }
            }
        }
    }
}

// run the parallel ITs
parallel(runITsTasks)

// JENKINS-34376 seems to make it hard to detect the aborted builds
} catch (org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.steps.FlowInterruptedException e) {
    echo "[FAILURE-002] FlowInterruptedException ${e}"

    repo uses the file:// protocol, and it doesn't refer to a shared
    filesystem, it will continue to be available.

  The question remaining is: Which level of offline mode will we support? It
  seems reasonable to assume that users will be able to tell when localhost is
  not active (in most cases, localhost should be available, even if the rest of
  the network is not). Therefore, let's concentrate on the state where no

                        }
                    }
                }
            }
        }
    }
}

// run the parallel ITs
parallel(runITsTasks)

// JENKINS-34376 seems to make it hard to detect the aborted builds
} catch (org.jenkinsci.plugins.workflow.steps.FlowInterruptedException e) {
    echo "[FAILURE-002] FlowInterruptedException ${e}"