* semantics are different. In particular, each of the body parts is an "alternative" version of
     * the same information.
     */
    @JvmField
    val ALTERNATIVE = "multipart/alternative".toMediaType()

    /**
     * This type is syntactically identical to "multipart/mixed", but the semantics are different.

  /**
   * Prevents the given methods from being run as part of the test suite.
   *
   * <p>Note: in principle this should never need to be used, but it might be useful if the
   * semantics of an implementation disagree in unforeseen ways with the semantics expected by a
   * test, or to keep dependent builds clean in spite of an erroneous test.
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public B suppressing(Method... methods) {

  /**
   * Prevents the given methods from being run as part of the test suite.
   *
   * <p>Note: in principle this should never need to be used, but it might be useful if the
   * semantics of an implementation disagree in unforeseen ways with the semantics expected by a
   * test, or to keep dependent builds clean in spite of an erroneous test.
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public B suppressing(Method... methods) {

     * <a href="https://maven.apache.org/resolver/configuration.html">Resolver Configuration</a> page option
     * {@code aether.artifactResolver.simpleLrmInterop} that provides similar semantics. This method should
     * be never invoked, and always returns {@code false}.
     */
    @Deprecated
    boolean isUseLegacyLocalRepository();

    /**
     * @since 3.1

  * This includes UDP, non-compliant HTTP, server-first protocols, stateful sets, external services, etc.
  * Explicitly opting into behavioral changes can be acceptable. For example, introducing Istio multi-cluster semantics.
* Ensure traffic between mesh workloads is securely encrypted with an Istio identity.
* Be lightweight enough to not limit adoption.

        try {
            NdrBuffer buf = encodeMessage(msg, out);
            int off = sendFragments(msg, out, buf);

            // last fragment gets written (possibly) using transact/call semantics
            int have = doSendReceiveFragment(out, off, msg.length, inB);

            if ( have != 0 ) {
                NdrBuffer hdrBuf = new NdrBuffer(inB, 0);
                setupReceivedFragment(hdrBuf);

 * case of (say) {@link HashSet}, which is an <i>implementation</i>, with semantics that were
 * largely defined by its supertype.
 *
 * <p>For field types and method return types, you should generally use the immutable type (such as
 * {@link ImmutableList}) instead of the general collection interface type (such as {@link List}).
 * This communicates to your callers all of the semantic guarantees listed above, which is almost
 * always very useful information.

// fields are allowed
message NetworkPolicyPeer {
  // podSelector is a label selector which selects pods. This field follows standard label
  // selector semantics; if present but empty, it selects all pods.
  //
  // If namespaceSelector is also set, then the NetworkPolicyPeer as a whole selects
  // the pods matching podSelector in the Namespaces selected by NamespaceSelector.

</p>

<p>
Don't be clever.
</p>

<h3 id="overview">Informal Overview</h3>

<p>
Go approaches its memory model in much the same way as the rest of the language,
aiming to keep the semantics simple, understandable, and useful.
This section gives a general overview of the approach and should suffice for most programmers.
The memory model is specified more formally in the next section.
</p>

<p>

 * case of (say) {@link HashSet}, which is an <i>implementation</i>, with semantics that were
 * largely defined by its supertype.
 *
 * <p>For field types and method return types, you should generally use the immutable type (such as
 * {@link ImmutableList}) instead of the general collection interface type (such as {@link List}).
 * This communicates to your callers all of the semantic guarantees listed above, which is almost
 * always very useful information.