if (to instanceof WildcardType) {
          return; // Okay to say Foo is <?>
        }
        // Can't map from a raw class to anything other than itself or a wildcard.
        // You can't say "assuming String is Integer".
        // And we don't support "assuming String is T"; user has to say "assuming T is String".

  `Exactly so,' said Alice.

  `Then you should say what you mean,' the March Hare went on.

  `I do,' Alice hastily replied; `at least--at least I mean what
I say--that's the same thing, you know.'

  `Not the same thing a bit!' said the Hatter.  `You might just
as well say that "I see what I eat" is the same thing as "I eat
what I see"!'

  `You might just as well say,' added the March Hare, `that "I

    writer.write(',');
    writer.write(0xBEEF0020); // only lower 16 bits are important
    writer.write("Wo");
    writer.write("Whirled".toCharArray(), 3, 2);
    writer.write("Mad! Mad, I say", 2, 2);

    assertEquals("Hello, World!", builder.toString());
  }

  public void testAppendMethods() throws IOException {
    StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();

 * presented below:
 *
 * <pre>
 * void runManyThings({@literal List<ThingToRun>} thingsToRun) {
 *   for (ThingToRun thingToRun : thingsToRun) {
 *     thingToRun.run(); // say this may throw an exception, but you want to
 *                       // always run all thingsToRun
 *   }
 * }
 * </pre>
 *
 * <p>This is what the code would become:
 *
 * <pre>

 * Otherwise, at least reduce <i>explicit</i> dependencies on this type by using lambda expressions
 * or method references instead of classes, leaving your code easier to migrate in the future.
 *
 * <p>To use an existing function (say, named {@code function}) in a context where the <i>other
 * type</i> of function is expected, use the method reference {@code function::apply}. A future

    return (Set<V>) super.replaceValues(key, values);
  }

  /**
   * {@inheritDoc}
   *
   * <p>Though the method signature doesn't say so explicitly, the returned map has {@link Set}
   * values.
   */
  @Override
  public Map<K, Collection<V>> asMap() {
    return super.asMap();
  }

  /**
   * Stores a key-value pair in the multimap.

  }

  public void testNulls() {
    /*
     * Don't bother testing. All non-primitive parameters are used only to construct error messages.
     * We never want to pass null for them, so we haven't annotated them to say that null is
     * allowed. But at the same time, it seems wasteful to bother inserting the checkNotNull calls
     * that NullPointerTester wants.
     *

   * It's unclear whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix
   * will be to permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on
   * the other. Thus, we say the bug is in add(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static Method getAddNullSupportedMethod() {

          @Override
          public void tearDown() throws Exception {
            synchronized (result.stack) {
              assertEquals(
                  "The test should have cleared the stack (say, by virtue of running runTearDown)",
                  0,
                  result.stack.size());
            }
          }
        });
    return result;
  }

 * presented below:
 *
 * <pre>
 * void runManyThings({@literal List<ThingToRun>} thingsToRun) {
 *   for (ThingToRun thingToRun : thingsToRun) {
 *     thingToRun.run(); // say this may throw an exception, but you want to
 *                       // always run all thingsToRun
 *   }
 * }
 * </pre>
 *
 * <p>This is what the code would become:
 *
 * <pre>